388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25691669)
1. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 25691669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept and Ramucirumab in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-based Therapy for the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan.
Kashiwa M; Matsushita R
Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1361-1375. PubMed ID: 32616433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Aflibercept in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-Based Therapy (FOLFIRI) for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Which has Progressed Following Prior Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy: a Critique of the Evidence.
Wade R; Duarte A; Simmonds M; Rodriguez-Lopez R; Duffy S; Woolacott N; Spackman E
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 May; 33(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 25616671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L
BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus mFOLFOX6 Compared to Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6 for First-line Treatment of Patients with Wild-type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer--Czech Republic Model Adaptation].
Fínek J; Skoupá J; Jandová P
Klin Onkol; 2015; 28(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 26299740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences of Chemotherapies and Targeted Biologics for Elderly Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Parikh RC; Du XL; Robert MO; Lairson DR
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 28025930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.
Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T
Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based regimens compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin alone among US elderly stage IV colon cancer patients.
Mullins CD; Hsiao FY; Onukwugha E; Pandya NB; Hanna N
Cancer; 2012 Jun; 118(12):3173-81. PubMed ID: 22020739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab-irinotecan-fluorouracil versus irinotecan-fluorouracil in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ruiz-Millo O; Albert-Mari A; Sendra-Garcia A; Jimenez-Torres NV
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2014 Oct; 20(5):341-50. PubMed ID: 24177355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in England and Wales.
Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Nov; 43(17):2487-94. PubMed ID: 17910914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Hind D; Tappenden P; Tumur I; Eggington S; Sutcliffe P; Ryan A
Health Technol Assess; 2008 May; 12(15):iii-ix, xi-162. PubMed ID: 18462574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of Capecitabine + Irinotecan Versus Leucovorin + Fluorouracil + Irinotecan in the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in China.
Wu Q; Zhang P; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Li Q
Clin Ther; 2020 Nov; 42(11):2148-2158.e2. PubMed ID: 32981743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Doublet Therapy in Metastatic BRAF Variant Colorectal Cancer.
Patel KK; Stein S; Lacy J; O'Hara M; Huntington SF
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2033441. PubMed ID: 33433598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
