These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25692241)

  • 1. Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.
    Løkkegaard E; Lundstrøm M; Kjær MM; Christensen IJ; Pedersen HB; Nyholm H
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(8):797-802. PubMed ID: 25692241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
    Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Du YM; Zhu LY; Cui LN; Jin BH; Ou JL
    BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):891-899. PubMed ID: 27533177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
    Liu YR; Pu CX; Wang XY; Wang XY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 30315411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.
    Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Arthuis C; Winer N; Parant O; Poncelet C; Chauleur C; Hannigsberg J; Ducarme G; Gallot D; Gabriel R; Desbriere R; Beucher G; Faraguet C; Isly H; Rozenberg P; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F;
    PLoS Med; 2021 Feb; 18(2):e1003448. PubMed ID: 33571294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section.
    Kehl S; Weiss C; Wamsler M; Beyer J; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Schleussner E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 26437956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature.
    Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Ten Eikelder ML; van Pampus MG; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van der Post JA; van der Salm P; Scheepers HC; Schuitemaker N; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 23870188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of labour using prostaglandin E
    Beckmann M; Gibbons K; Flenady V; Kumar S
    BJOG; 2020 Apr; 127(5):571-579. PubMed ID: 31785056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for women with PrOlongedPregnancies (MAGPOP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a silicone double balloon catheter versus the Propess system for the slow release of dinoprostone for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies.
    Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016069. PubMed ID: 28912192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MEchanical DIlatation of the Cervix-- in a Scarred uterus (MEDICS): the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial comparing a single cervical catheter balloon and prostaglandin PGE2 for cervical ripening and labour induction following caesarean delivery.
    Choo SN; Kanneganti A; Abdul Aziz MNDB; Loh L; Hargreaves C; Gopal V; Biswas A; Chan YH; Ismail IS; Chi C; Mattar C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e028896. PubMed ID: 31699720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.
    Suffecool K; Rosenn BM; Kam S; Mushi J; Foroutan J; Herrera K
    J Perinat Med; 2014 Mar; 42(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 24096438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Du C; Liu Y; Liu Y; Ding H; Zhang R; Tan J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1221-7. PubMed ID: 25408273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
    Tan PC; Valiapan SD; Tay PY; Omar SZ
    BJOG; 2007 Jul; 114(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 17506788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert].
    Pez V; Deruelle P; Kyheng M; Boyon C; Clouqueur E; Garabedian C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018; 46(7-8):570-574. PubMed ID: 29903553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Double-balloon device and intravaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in women with unfavourable cervix].
    Letailleur M; Mathieu N; Dietrich G; Lethuilier C; Verspyck E; Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Jun; 43(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 25943409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.