311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25692546)
1. In silico analysis of the interaction of avian aryl hydrocarbon receptors and dioxins to decipher isoform-, ligand-, and species-specific activations.
Hirano M; Hwang JH; Park HJ; Bak SM; Iwata H; Kim EY
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3795-804. PubMed ID: 25692546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro and in silico evaluation of transactivation potencies of avian AHR1 and AHR2 by endogenous ligands: Implications for the physiological role of avian AHR2.
Kim IS; Hwang JH; Hirano M; Iwata H; Kim EY
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Sep; 187():1-9. PubMed ID: 27060260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular and functional characterization of a novel aryl hydrocarbon receptor isoform, AHR1β, in the chicken (Gallus gallus).
Lee JS; Iwabuchi K; Nomaru K; Nagahama N; Kim EY; Iwata H
Toxicol Sci; 2013 Dec; 136(2):450-66. PubMed ID: 23997109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The AHR1-ARNT1 dimerization pair is a major regulator of the response to natural ligands, but not to TCDD, in the chicken.
Koh DH; Hwang JH; Park JG; Song WS; Iwata H; Kim EY
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Sep; 201():110835. PubMed ID: 32563159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity of avian species to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand 6-formylindolo [3,2-b] carbazole (FICZ).
Farmahin R; Crump D; Kennedy SW
Chem Biol Interact; 2014 Sep; 221():61-9. PubMed ID: 25093689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional characterization and evolutionary history of two aryl hydrocarbon receptor isoforms (AhR1 and AhR2) from avian species.
Yasui T; Kim EY; Iwata H; Franks DG; Karchner SI; Hahn ME; Tanabe S
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Sep; 99(1):101-17. PubMed ID: 17556759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor 2 potentially mediates cytochrome P450 1A induction in the jungle crow (Corvus macrorhynchos).
Kim EY; Inoue N; Koh DH; Iwata H
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Apr; 171():99-111. PubMed ID: 30597322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequence and in vitro function of chicken, ring-necked pheasant, and Japanese quail AHR1 predict in vivo sensitivity to dioxins.
Farmahin R; Wu D; Crump D; Hervé JC; Jones SP; Hahn ME; Karchner SI; Giesy JP; Bursian SJ; Zwiernik MJ; Kennedy SW
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2967-75. PubMed ID: 22296185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Specific ligand binding domain residues confer low dioxin responsiveness to AHR1β of Xenopus laevis.
Odio C; Holzman SA; Denison MS; Fraccalvieri D; Bonati L; Franks DG; Hahn ME; Powell WH
Biochemistry; 2013 Mar; 52(10):1746-54. PubMed ID: 23394719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dioxin activation of CYP1A5 promoter/enhancer regions from two avian species, common cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) and chicken (Gallus gallus): association with aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 and 2 isoforms.
Lee JS; Kim EY; Iwata H
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 18948129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro transactivation potencies of black-footed albatross (Phoebastria nigripes) AHR1 and AHR2 by dioxins to predict CYP1A expression in the wild population.
Mol TL; Kim EY; Ishibashi H; Iwata H
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(1):525-33. PubMed ID: 22074031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of in ovo exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on hepatic AHR/ARNT-CYP1A signaling pathways in common cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo).
Iwata H; Nagahama N; Kim EY; Watanabe MX; Sudo A
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Aug; 152(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 20417310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Key amino acids in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor predict dioxin sensitivity in avian species.
Head JA; Hahn ME; Kennedy SW
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Oct; 42(19):7535-41. PubMed ID: 18939598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification and expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhR1 and AhR2) provide insight in an evolutionary context regarding sensitivity of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) to dioxin-like compounds.
Doering JA; Wiseman S; Beitel SC; Giesy JP; Hecker M
Aquat Toxicol; 2014 May; 150():27-35. PubMed ID: 24632312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In Silico and In Vitro multiple analysis approach for screening naturally derived ligands for red seabream aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
Choi JI; Song WS; Koh DH; Kim EY
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Apr; 275():116262. PubMed ID: 38569320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amino acid sequence of the ligand-binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 predicts sensitivity of wild birds to effects of dioxin-like compounds.
Farmahin R; Manning GE; Crump D; Wu D; Mundy LJ; Jones SP; Hahn ME; Karchner SI; Giesy JP; Bursian SJ; Zwiernik MJ; Fredricks TB; Kennedy SW
Toxicol Sci; 2013 Jan; 131(1):139-52. PubMed ID: 22923492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness of a Xenopus laevis cell line to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).
Laub LB; Jones BD; Powell WH
Chem Biol Interact; 2010 Jan; 183(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 19799885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auto-induction mechanism of aryl hydrocarbon receptor 2 (AHR2) gene by TCDD-activated AHR1 and AHR2 in the red seabream (Pagrus major).
Bak SM; Iida M; Soshilov AA; Denison MS; Iwata H; Kim EY
Arch Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 91(1):301-312. PubMed ID: 27188387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potencies of red seabream AHR1- and AHR2-mediated transactivation by dioxins: implication of both AHRs in dioxin toxicity.
Bak SM; Iida M; Hirano M; Iwata H; Kim EY
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2877-85. PubMed ID: 23402477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of homology models of the AH receptor ligand binding domain: verification of structure-function predictions by site-directed mutagenesis of a nonfunctional receptor.
Fraccalvieri D; Soshilov AA; Karchner SI; Franks DG; Pandini A; Bonati L; Hahn ME; Denison MS
Biochemistry; 2013 Jan; 52(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 23286227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
