These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25692789)

  • 1. Randomized double-blind trial comparing the cosmetic outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incisions.
    Aird LN; Bristol SG; Phang PT; Raval MJ; Brown CJ
    Br J Surg; 2015 Apr; 102(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 25692789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cautery versus scalpel for abdominal skin incisions: a double blind, randomized crossover trial of scar cosmesis.
    Stupart DA; Sim FW; Chan ZH; Guest GD; Watters DA
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 24165306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel skin incisions in uncomplicated appendectomy: A comparative study.
    Okereke CE; Katung AI; Adesunkanmi AK; Alatise OI
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2019; 26(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 31187749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision.
    Ly J; Mittal A; Windsor J
    Br J Surg; 2012 May; 99(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 22367850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.
    Kearns SR; Connolly EM; McNally S; McNamara DA; Deasy J
    Br J Surg; 2001 Jan; 88(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 11136307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scalpel versus diathermy skin incision in Caesarean section.
    AbdElaal NK; Ellakwa HE; Elhalaby AF; Shaheen AE; Aish AH
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Apr; 39(3):340-344. PubMed ID: 30634889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative cosmetic outcome of surgical incisions created by the PEAK Plasma Blade and a scalpel after cesarean section by Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS): A randomized double blind study.
    Ekin M; Dagdeviren H; Caypinar SS; Erdogan B; Ayag ME; Cengiz H; Yasar L; Helvacioglu Ç
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 29458906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ismail A; Abushouk AI; Elmaraezy A; Menshawy A; Menshawy E; Ismail M; Samir E; Khaled A; Zakarya H; El-Tonoby A; Ghanem E
    J Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 220():147-163. PubMed ID: 29180177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of wound healing in rat skin following incision with a novel picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) and different surgical modalities.
    Petersen H; Tavakoli F; Kruber S; Münscher A; Gliese A; Hansen NO; Uschold S; Eggert D; Robertson WD; Gosau T; Sehner S; Kwiatkowski M; Schlüter H; Schumacher U; Knecht R; Miller RJ
    Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Apr; 48(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 26941063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diathermy vs. scalpel skin incisions in general surgery: double-blind, randomized, clinical trial.
    Shamim M
    World J Surg; 2009 Aug; 33(8):1594-9. PubMed ID: 19418093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer.
    Kumar V; Tewari M; Shukla HS
    Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 21768669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and conventional subcuticular skin sutures for maxillofacial incisions--a prospective randomized trial considering closure time, wound morbidity, and cosmetic outcome.
    Soni A; Narula R; Kumar A; Parmar M; Sahore M; Chandel M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 71(12):2152.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24237777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Maw A
    Int J Surg; 2020 Mar; 75():35-43. PubMed ID: 31978649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review and meta-analysis of electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical skin incisions.
    Aird LN; Brown CJ
    Am J Surg; 2012 Aug; 204(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 22537473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical site infection: an observer-blind, randomized trial comparing electrocautery and conventional scalpel.
    Rongetti RL; Oliveira e Castro Pde T; Vieira RA; Serrano SV; Mengatto MF; Fregnani JH
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 24866067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised control trial of intraoperative and early outcome in scalpel versus monopolar diathermy for midline abdominal incisions.
    Igwe PO; Dodiyi-Manuel A; Wichendu PN
    S Afr J Surg; 2022 Sep; 60(3):167-170. PubMed ID: 36155370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty.
    Chrysos E; Athanasakis E; Antonakakis S; Xynos E; Zoras O
    Am Surg; 2005 Apr; 71(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 15943407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of superficial surgical site infection following use of diathermy and scalpel for making skin incision in inguinal hernioplasty.
    Ali Q; Siddique K; Mirza S; Malik AZ
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 12(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 20329674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Scalpel versus Diathermy for Skin Incision in Ear, Nose, Throat and Head and Neck Surgeries.
    Shrestha D
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2018 Mar; 16(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 29717291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-skin incision scar tissue assessment using patient and observer scar assessment scales: A randomised controlled trial.
    Oley MH; Oley MC; Kepel BJ; Manginstar C; Rawung R; Langi FLFG; Barends D; Aling DMR; Wagiu AMJ; Faruk M
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2021 Nov; 71():103006. PubMed ID: 34840756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.