BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25693034)

  • 1. New stereoacuity test using a 3-dimensional display system in children.
    Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116626. PubMed ID: 25693034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between depth perception by three-rods test and stereoacuity by distance Randot Stereotest.
    Matsuo T; Negayama R; Sakata H; Hasebe K
    Strabismus; 2014 Sep; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 25058604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Final version of the Distance Randot Stereotest: normative data, reliability, and validity.
    Wang J; Hatt SR; O'Connor AR; Drover JR; Adams R; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2010 Apr; 14(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20199880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stereoacuity norms for school-age children using the Frisby stereotest.
    Anketell PM; Saunders KJ; Little JA
    J AAPOS; 2013 Dec; 17(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 24321423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ASTEROID stereotest v1.0: lower stereo thresholds using smaller, denser and faster dots.
    Read JCA; Wong ZY; Yek X; Wong YX; Bachtoula O; Llamas-Cornejo I; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Nov; 40(6):815-827. PubMed ID: 32989799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity.
    Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 26927523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stereotest Comparison: Efficacy, Reliability, and Variability of a New Glasses-Free Stereotest.
    McCaslin AG; Vancleef K; Hubert L; Read JCA; Port N
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Aug; 9(9):29. PubMed ID: 32879785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a New, Filter-Free Stereopsis Test (BEST) With the Randot Stereotest in a Pediatric Cohort.
    Lagstein O; Hecht I; Anteby I
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Mar; 57(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 32203597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of FD2 (Frisby Davis distance) stereotest in surgical management of intermittent exotropia.
    Singh A; Sharma P; Singh D; Saxena R; Sharma A; Menon V
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 97(10):1318-21. PubMed ID: 23902676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A New Distance Stereotest by Autostereoscopic Display Using an Eye-Tracking Method.
    Cao LQ; Wang YQ; Gao Y; Zhou BY; Li XL; Shen KQ; Xu B; Li MG
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():799744. PubMed ID: 35795164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and validity of an automated computerized visual acuity and stereoacuity test in children using an interactive video game.
    Ma DJ; Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 156(1):195-201.e1. PubMed ID: 23582763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of a new Distance Randot stereoacuity test.
    Fu VL; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2006 Oct; 10(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 17070476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real depth vs randot stereotests.
    Leske DA; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17011876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating stereoacuity with 3D shutter glasses technology.
    Wu H; Jin H; Sun Y; Wang Y; Ge M; Chen Y; Chi Y
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 16(1):45. PubMed ID: 27112418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.
    Vancleef K; Read JCA; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28337792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normative Values for Near and Distance Clinical Tests of Stereoacuity.
    Piano ME; Tidbury LP; O'Connor AR
    Strabismus; 2016 Dec; 24(4):169-172. PubMed ID: 27929725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randot stereoacuity does not accurately predict ability to perform two practical tests of depth perception at a near distance.
    Long J; Siu C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 82(10):912-5. PubMed ID: 16276324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.
    Holmes JM; Fawcett SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distance stereotesting using vision test charts for intermittent exotropia.
    Nishikawa N; Ishiko S; Yamaga I; Sato M; Yoshida A
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1557-62. PubMed ID: 26346264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the INNOVA Visual Acuity System Stereotest with the Frisby-Davis 2 Stereotest for the Evaluation of Distance Stereoacuity.
    Singman EL; Matta NS; Silbert DI; Tian J
    Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2013; 28(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 23822912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.