230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25693882)
1. Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis.
Zeng M; Xie J; Li M; Lin S; Hu Y
Int Orthop; 2015 Aug; 39(8):1513-8. PubMed ID: 25693882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision.
Hernigou P; Dupuys N; Delambre J; Guissou I; Poignard A; Allain J; Flouzat Lachaniette CH
Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 25231573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.
Otero JE; Martin JR; Rowe TM; Odum SM; Mason JB
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1069-1073. PubMed ID: 31870582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects.
Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL
Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Contemporary Triple-Tapered Titanium Stem.
Carlson SW; Goetz DD; Liu SS; Greiner JJ; Callaghan JJ
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-6. PubMed ID: 27339824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.
Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application of modular cementless femoral stems in complex revision hip arthroplasty].
Zhang ZD; Zhuo Q; Zhang QM; Song JL; Yang Fan ; Chen JY
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2015 Mar; 28(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 25936185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.
Ding ZC; Ling TX; Yuan MC; Qin YZ; Mou P; Wang HY; Zhou ZK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 32268894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical results in early and mid term of using the S-ROM femoral stem in revision].
Piao S; Zhou YG; Du YQ; Ma HY; Sun JY; Gao ZS; Peng YW; Wu WM
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Apr; 30(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 29349981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hip revision arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis in periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 fractures using a cementless, modular, tapered revision stem.
Fink B; Oremek D
Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):11-16. PubMed ID: 28363889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes and survival rate of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up.
Kang JS; Na Y; Ko BS; Jeon YS
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(3):2309499018812241. PubMed ID: 30449250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cementless Modular, Fluted, Tapered Stem for Massive Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Zheng K; Li N; Zhang W; Zhu Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Geng D
Orthop Surg; 2021 May; 13(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 33821565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extensively Porous-Coated Stems Demonstrate Excellent Long-Term Survivorship in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Dagneaux L; Sculco PK; Haight HJ; Larson DR; Howard JL; Abdel MP; Berry DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S217-S222. PubMed ID: 36907385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Wang L; Dai Z; Wen T; Li M; Hu Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Feb; 133(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 23124491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?
Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total hip arthroplasty after removal of a fractured well-fixed extensively porous-coated femoral component using a trephine.
Amanatullah DF; Siman H; Pallante GD; Haber DB; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 26330584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
