186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25693934)
1. Is the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage different between laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer? A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials.
Hua L; Wang C; Yao K; Zhang J; Chen J; Ma W
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014 Dec; 10 Suppl():272-5. PubMed ID: 25693934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Xu W; Xu Z; Cheng H; Ying J; Cheng F; Xu W; Cao J; Luo J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1841-1850. PubMed ID: 27697315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer].
Qu C; Yuan RF; Huang J; Liu L; Jiang CH; Yang ZQ; Shao JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 16(8):748-52. PubMed ID: 23980046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
Ma B; Gao P; Song Y; Zhang C; Zhang C; Wang L; Liu H; Wang Z
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():380. PubMed ID: 27377924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery and Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of T1 Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Lu JY; Lin GL; Qiu HZ; Xiao Y; Wu B; Zhou JL
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0141427. PubMed ID: 26505895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.
Akiyoshi T; Ueno M; Fukunaga Y; Nagayama S; Fujimoto Y; Konishi T; Kuroyanagi H; Yamaguchi T
Am J Surg; 2011 Sep; 202(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 21871980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of results of randomized controlled trials.
Xiong B; Ma L; Zhang C
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Sep; 22(7):674-84. PubMed ID: 22881123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.
Akiyoshi T; Kuroyanagi H; Oya M; Konishi T; Fukuda M; Fujimoto Y; Ueno M; Miyata S; Yamaguchi T
Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19715805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients.
Katsuno H; Shiomi A; Ito M; Koide Y; Maeda K; Yatsuoka T; Hase K; Komori K; Minami K; Sakamoto K; Saida Y; Saito N
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2848-56. PubMed ID: 26487228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical resection for rectal cancer. Is laparoscopic surgery as successful as open approach? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Milone M; Manigrasso M; Burati M; Velotti N; Milone F; De Palma GD
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204887. PubMed ID: 30300377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Total mesorectal excision versus conventional radical surgery for rectal cancer: a meta analysis].
Liang YC; Qing SH; Ding WX; Chen PY; Huang YB; Yu HT
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jan; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 17253173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conversion is a risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients - A retrospective cohort study.
Liu XH; Wu XR; Zhou C; Zheng XB; Ke J; Liu HS; Hu T; Chen YF; He XW; He XS; Chen YL; Zou YF; Wang JP; Wu XJ; Lan P
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():298-303. PubMed ID: 29367043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prophylactic pelvic drainage after rectal resection with extraperitoneal anastomosis: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Menahem B; Vallois A; Alves A; Lubrano J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1531-1538. PubMed ID: 28840326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Meta-analysis for high-risk factor of anastomotic leakage after anal-preserving surgery for rectal cancer].
Ye Y; Jiang H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apirl 25; 21(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 29682718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prophylactic transanal decompression tube versus non-prophylactic transanal decompression tube for anastomotic leakage prevention in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Yang Y; Shu Y; Su F; Xia L; Duan B; Wu X
Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1513-1523. PubMed ID: 27620910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for early complications after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer: A single center experience.
Liu L; Wang T; Zhang G; Dai R; Liang H; Tang L
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(1):350-4. PubMed ID: 27072262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Tang B; Lei X; Ai J; Huang Z; Shi J; Li T
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 19(1):38. PubMed ID: 33536032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zheng J; Feng X; Yang Z; Hu W; Luo Y; Li Y
Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(8):12717-12729. PubMed ID: 28038460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current status of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
Gopall J; Shen XF; Cheng Y
Am J Surg; 2012 Feb; 203(2):230-41. PubMed ID: 22269656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of anastomotic reinforcing sutures on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
He Y; Zhu Z; Liu S; Liu L; Hu B; Wan X; Huang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apirl 25; 21(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 29682715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
