125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25693951)
1. The use of risk and need factors in forensic mental health decision-making and the role of gender and index offense severity.
Wilson CM; Crocker AG; Nicholls TL; Charette Y; Seto MC
Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 25693951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic and static factors associated with discharge dispositions: the national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (NCRMD) in Canada.
Crocker AG; Nicholls TL; Charette Y; Seto MC
Behav Sci Law; 2014 Sep; 32(5):577-95. PubMed ID: 25236295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors Associated with Review Board Dispositions following Re-hospitalization among Discharged Persons found Not Criminally Responsible.
Wilson CM; Nicholls TL; Charette Y; Seto MC; Crocker AG
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):278-94. PubMed ID: 27041680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. To detain or to release? Correlates of dispositions for individuals declared not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder.
Crocker AG; Braithwaite E; Côté G; Nicholls TL; Seto MC
Can J Psychiatry; 2011 May; 56(5):293-302. PubMed ID: 21586195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Housing Trajectories of Forensic Psychiatric Patients.
Salem L; Crocker AG; Charette Y; Earls CM; Nicholls TL; Seto MC
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):352-65. PubMed ID: 27138216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk assessment instruments in clinical practice.
Côté G; Crocker AG; Nicholls TL; Seto MC
Can J Psychiatry; 2012 Apr; 57(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 22480589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 2: the people behind the label.
Crocker AG; Nicholls TL; Seto MC; Charette Y; Côté G; Caulet M
Can J Psychiatry; 2015 Mar; 60(3):106-16. PubMed ID: 25886686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Static and dynamic predictors of forensic mental health decision-making.
Cheng J; Olver ME; Haag AM; Wormith JS
Psychol Serv; 2023 Nov; 20(4):899-907. PubMed ID: 36395060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supportive housing and forensic patient outcomes.
Salem L; Crocker AG; Charette Y; Seto MC; Nicholls TL; Côté G
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 25365472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motivational influences in persons found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder: a review of legislation and research.
Penney SR; Morgan A; Simpson AI
Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(4):494-505. PubMed ID: 23613184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 1: context and methods.
Crocker AG; Nicholls TL; Seto MC; Côté G; Charette Y; Caulet M
Can J Psychiatry; 2015 Mar; 60(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 25886685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder. Part 5: how essential are gender-specific forensic psychiatric services?
Nicholls TL; Crocker AG; Seto MC; Wilson CM; Charette Y; Côté G
Can J Psychiatry; 2015 Mar; 60(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 25886689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limitations of study on violent crime and mental illness.
Pinta ER
Am J Psychiatry; 2006 Dec; 163(12):2193; author reply 2194. PubMed ID: 17151176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The increasing influence of risk assessment on forensic patient review board decisions.
Hilton NZ; Simpson AI; Ham E
Psychol Serv; 2016 Aug; 13(3):223-231. PubMed ID: 27504642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 3: trajectories and outcomes through the forensic system.
Crocker AG; Charette Y; Seto MC; Nicholls TL; Côté G; Caulet M
Can J Psychiatry; 2015 Mar; 60(3):117-26. PubMed ID: 25886687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An analogue study of the factors influencing competency decisions.
Blashfield RK; Robbins L; Barnard GW
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(4):587-94. PubMed ID: 7718931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics associated with criminal responsibility assessment outcomes among women in Central Canada.
Hardman MP; Nijdam-Jones A; Demetrioff S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 94():101988. PubMed ID: 38735266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
Konrad N; Völlm B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
Mossière A; Maeder EM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The precarious practice of forensic psychiatric risk assessments.
Nilsson T; Munthe C; Gustavson C; Forsman A; Anckarsäter H
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 19800123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
