These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25693952)

  • 1. Preventative detention decisions: reliance on expert assessments and evidence of partisan allegiance within the Canadian context.
    Blais J
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):74-91. PubMed ID: 25693952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosecution-retained versus court-appointed experts: comparing and contrasting risk assessment reports in preventative detention hearings.
    Blais J; Forth AE
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):531-43. PubMed ID: 24707913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When experts disagreed, who was correct? A comparison of PCL-R scores from independent raters and opposing forensic experts.
    Rufino KA; Boccaccini MT; Hawes SW; Murrie DC
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):527-37. PubMed ID: 22353047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender differences in attitudes toward psychopathic sexual offenders.
    Guy LS; Edens JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 16491475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony.
    Guy LS; Edens JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):215-37. PubMed ID: 12645046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Jurors' views on the value and objectivity of mental health experts testifying in sexually violent predator trials.
    Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Turner DB
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):483-95. PubMed ID: 25043830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: a case law survey.
    DeMatteo D; Edens JF; Galloway M; Cox J; Smith ST; Formon D
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24127888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A practical guide for the evaluation of sexual recidivism risk in mentally retarded sex offenders.
    Phenix A; Sreenivasan S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):509-24. PubMed ID: 20018999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Not Available].
    Rivallan A
    Soins Psychiatr; 2017; 38(309):11-43. PubMed ID: 28284281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk communication in sexually violent predator hearings.
    Scott S; Gilcrist B; Thurston N; Huss MT
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):322-36. PubMed ID: 19908210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Issues for DSM-V: unintended consequences of small changes: the case of paraphilias.
    First MB; Frances A
    Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Oct; 165(10):1240-1. PubMed ID: 18829878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Sensitive violent sex offense topic. Fear of recurrence].
    Wepner U
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2005 Dec; 147(48):22. PubMed ID: 16389857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jurors report that risk measure scores matter in sexually violent predator trials, but that other factors matter more.
    Turner DB; Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Harris PB
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 25613035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Is the court-ordered treatment indication by the expert based on a medical diagnosis?].
    Spriet H; Abondo M; Naudet F; Bouvet R; Le Gueut M
    Encephale; 2014 Sep; 40(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 24094867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ["Serious crimes during treatment in legal psychiatric commitment (section 63 StGB)."Comment on the contribution by R. Freese et a].
    Leygraf N
    Nervenarzt; 1997 May; 68(5):434-7. PubMed ID: 9280856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Washington State's unscientific approach to the problem of repeat sex offenders.
    Brody AL; Green R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 7841506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States.
    Mercado CC; Ogloff JR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 17157911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Preventive detention: empirical findings concerning the detainees and the quality of forensic-psychiatric reports].
    Habermeyer E; Passow D; Puhlmann P; Vohs K
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2008 Nov; 76(11):672-7. PubMed ID: 18988149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The right to community treatment for mentally disordered sex offenders.
    Cornwell JK
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2004; 34(4):1213-32. PubMed ID: 15619795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them?
    Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT; Guarnera LA; Rufino KA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1889-97. PubMed ID: 23969777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.