These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25693987)

  • 1. Evaluating the impact of high- and low-fidelity instruction in the development of auscultation skills.
    Chen R; Grierson LE; Norman GR
    Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 49(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 25693987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative effectiveness of high- versus low-fidelity simulation in learning heart sounds.
    de Giovanni D; Roberts T; Norman G
    Med Educ; 2009 Jul; 43(7):661-8. PubMed ID: 19573189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardiac Auscultation Lab Using a Heart Sounds Auscultation Simulation Manikin.
    Quinn A; Kaminsky J; Adler A; Eisner S; Ovitsh R
    MedEdPORTAL; 2019 Oct; 15():10839. PubMed ID: 31976362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manipulation of cognitive load variables and impact on auscultation test performance.
    Chen R; Grierson L; Norman G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 Oct; 20(4):935-52. PubMed ID: 25430065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating high-fidelity human simulators and standardized patients in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course.
    Luctkar-Flude M; Wilson-Keates B; Larocque M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2012 May; 32(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 21565436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technology for enhancing chest auscultation in clinical simulation.
    Ward JJ; Wattier BA
    Respir Care; 2011 Jun; 56(6):834-45. PubMed ID: 21333091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time to unravel the conceptual confusion of authenticity and fidelity and their contribution to learning within simulation-based nurse education. A discussion paper.
    Bland AJ; Topping A; Tobbell J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2014 Jul; 34(7):1112-8. PubMed ID: 24731565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of the use of a simulation software in the learning of cardiopulmonary auscultation in undergraduate medical students].
    Malmartel A; Ecollan M; Bories MC; Jablon E; Planquette B; Ranque B
    Rev Med Interne; 2020 Oct; 41(10):653-660. PubMed ID: 32660857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Low- Versus High-Fidelity Simulations on the Cognitive Burden and Performance of Entry-Level Paramedicine Students: A Mixed-Methods Comparison Trial Using Eye-Tracking, Continuous Heart Rate, Difficulty Rating Scales, Video Observation and Interviews.
    Mills BW; Carter OB; Rudd CJ; Claxton LA; Ross NP; Strobel NA
    Simul Healthc; 2016 Feb; 11(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 26536339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation-based mastery learning improves cardiac auscultation skills in medical students.
    Butter J; McGaghie WC; Cohen ER; Kaye M; Wayne DB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2010 Aug; 25(8):780-5. PubMed ID: 20339952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of baccalaureate nursing student self-efficacy before and after simulation.
    Cardoza MP; Hood PA
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Mar; 30(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 22080746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of learning effects using high-fidelity and multi-mode simulation: an application of emergency care for a patient with cardiac arrest].
    Ryoo EN; Ha EH; Cho JY
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2013 Apr; 43(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23703596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Teaching advanced cardiac life support protocols: the effectiveness of static versus high-fidelity simulation.
    King JM; Reising DL
    Nurse Educ; 2011; 36(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 21330894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of varied levels of simulation fidelity on integrated performance of technical skills in midwifery students--a randomised intervention trial.
    Brady S; Bogossian F; Gibbons K
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Mar; 35(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 25433985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning.
    Norman G; Dore K; Grierson L
    Med Educ; 2012 Jul; 46(7):636-47. PubMed ID: 22616789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is high fidelity human patient (mannequin) simulation, simulation of learning?
    McGarry D; Cashin A; Fowler C
    Nurse Educ Today; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1138-42. PubMed ID: 24837517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Theory-based research of high fidelity simulation use in nursing education: a review of the literature.
    Rourke L; Schmidt M; Garga N
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2010; 7():Article11. PubMed ID: 20361859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Third-year undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of high-fidelity simulation.
    Wotton K; Davis J; Button D; Kelton M
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Nov; 49(11):632-9. PubMed ID: 20795614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An exploration of the relationship between knowledge and performance-related variables in high-fidelity simulation: designing instruction that promotes expertise in practice.
    Hauber RP; Cormier E; Whyte J
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2010; 31(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 20882866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of high fidelity human simulation on self-efficacy of communication skills.
    Kameg K; Howard VM; Clochesy J; Mitchell AM; Suresky JM
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2010 May; 31(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 20394477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.