BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25694015)

  • 1. Histologic upgrading in patients eligible for active surveillance on saturation biopsy.
    Chung PH; Darwish OM; Roehrborn CG; Kapur P; Lotan Y
    Can J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):7656-60. PubMed ID: 25694015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
    Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
    Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypia on prostate biopsy does not adversely affect prostatectomy outcomes for patients otherwise eligible for active surveillance.
    Pietzak EJ; Kabarriti AE; Mucksavage P; Bavaria T; Van Arsdalen K; Malkowicz SB; Wein AJ; Guzzo TJ
    Urology; 2014 Dec; 84(6):1442-7. PubMed ID: 25288572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
    Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS).
    El Hajj A; Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22726582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis.
    Reese AC; Landis P; Han M; Epstein JI; Carter HB
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2033-8. PubMed ID: 23680308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
    Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
    BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging does not improve the prediction of misclassification of prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance when the most stringent selection criteria are based on the saturation biopsy scheme.
    Ploussard G; Xylinas E; Durand X; Ouzaïd I; Allory Y; Bouanane M; Abbou CC; Salomon L; de la Taille A
    BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 21176083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
    Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
    Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy.
    Arsov C; Becker N; Rabenalt R; Hiester A; Quentin M; Dietzel F; Antoch G; Gabbert HE; Albers P; Schimmöller L
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 141(11):2061-8. PubMed ID: 26013424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active Surveillance is an Appropriate Management Strategy for a Proportion of Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer by Prostate Specific Antigen Testing.
    Overholser S; Nielsen M; Torkko K; Cwilka D; Weaver B; Shi X; Leach RJ; Hernandez J; Huang T; Thompson IM; Thompson IM
    J Urol; 2015 Sep; 194(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 25636657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.
    Hong SK; Sternberg IA; Keren Paz GE; Kim PH; Touijer KA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23954083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
    Dinh KT; Mahal BA; Ziehr DR; Muralidhar V; Chen YW; Viswanathan VB; Nezolosky MD; Beard CJ; Choueiri TK; Martin NE; Orio PF; Sweeney CJ; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
    J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):343-9. PubMed ID: 25681290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detailed biopsy pathologic features as predictive factors for initial reclassification in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
    Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Terry S; Allory Y; Ouzaïd I; Vacherot F; Abbou CC; Salomon L
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1060-6. PubMed ID: 22300755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.