128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25694048)
1. Syllable transposition effects in korean word recognition.
Lee CH; Kwon Y; Kim K; Rastle K
J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Jun; 44(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 25694048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lateralized displays reveal the perceptual locus of the syllable transposition effect in Korean.
Kim S; Paterson KB; Nam K; Lee C
Neuropsychologia; 2024 Jul; 199():108907. PubMed ID: 38734179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early use of orthographic information in spoken word recognition: Event-related potential evidence from the Korean language.
Kwon Y; Choi S; Lee Y
Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):544-52. PubMed ID: 26669620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition.
Lee CH; Taft M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 21327354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. THE INFLUENCE OF SYLLABIFICATION RULES IN L1 ON L2 WORD RECOGNITION.
Choi W; Nam K; Lee Y
Psychol Rep; 2015 Oct; 117(2):535-53. PubMed ID: 26340053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Syllable Frequency and Spoken Word Recognition: An Inhibitory Effect.
González-Alvarez J; Palomar-García MA
Psychol Rep; 2016 Aug; 119(1):263-75. PubMed ID: 27287267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?
Perea M; Carreiras M
Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 17176663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition.
Carreiras M; Ferrand L; Grainger J; Perea M
Psychol Sci; 2005 Aug; 16(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 16102059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.
Muncer SJ; Knight DC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2221-30. PubMed ID: 22804754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masked transposition priming effects are observed in Korean in the same-different task.
Lee CH; Lally C; Rastle K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Aug; 74(8):1439-1450. PubMed ID: 33573527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.
Arciuli J; Cupples L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):920-48. PubMed ID: 16608755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhibition and facilitation in visual word recognition: prefrontal contribution to the orthographic neighborhood size effect.
Fiebach CJ; Ricker B; Friederici AD; Jacobs AM
Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(3):901-11. PubMed ID: 17498973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extending models of visual-word recognition to semicursive scripts: Evidence from masked priming in Uyghur.
Yakup M; Abliz W; Sereno J; Perea M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1553-62. PubMed ID: 26618626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect.
Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1930-47. PubMed ID: 19358058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.
Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1267-89. PubMed ID: 20804296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Kaniso activate CASINO?: input coding schemes and phonology in visual-word recognition.
Acha J; Perea M
Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 20178943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrophysiological markers of syllable frequency during written word recognition in French.
Chetail F; Colin C; Content A
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3429-39. PubMed ID: 23044275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?
Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1600-13. PubMed ID: 16873111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
