337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25694244)
1. Passive perceptual learning versus active searching in a novel stimuli vigilance task.
Head J; Helton WS
Exp Brain Res; 2015 May; 233(5):1481-9. PubMed ID: 25694244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention.
Matthews G; Warm JS; Reinerman-Jones LE; Langheim LK; Washburn DA; Tripp L
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 20565203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention.
Head J; Helton WS
Conscious Cogn; 2012 Dec; 21(4):1617-25. PubMed ID: 23000831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time performance modelling of a Sustained Attention to Response Task.
Larue GS; Rakotonirainy A; Pettitt AN
Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1205-16. PubMed ID: 20865604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of state motivation in overload and underload vigilance task scenarios.
Neigel AR; Claypoole VL; Szalma JL
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():106-114. PubMed ID: 31132570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Missed targets, reaction times, and arousal are related to trait anxiety and attention to pain during an experimental vigilance task with a painful target.
Emerson NM; Meeker TJ; Greenspan JD; Saffer MI; Campbell CM; Korzeniewska A; Lenz FA
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Feb; 123(2):462-472. PubMed ID: 31596643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The configural properties of task stimuli do influence vigilance performance.
de Joux NR; Wilson K; Russell PN; Helton WS
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2619-26. PubMed ID: 26026808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new semantic vigilance task: vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs.
Epling SL; Russell PN; Helton WS
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 26403293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attention lapses and behavioural microsleeps during tracking, psychomotor vigilance, and dual tasks.
Buckley RJ; Helton WS; Innes CRH; Dalrymple-Alford JC; Jones RD
Conscious Cogn; 2016 Oct; 45():174-183. PubMed ID: 27619820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of nocturnal slow-wave activity affects daytime vigilance lapses and memory encoding but not reaction time or implicit learning.
Van Der Werf YD; Altena E; Vis JC; Koene T; Van Someren EJ
Prog Brain Res; 2011; 193():245-55. PubMed ID: 21854967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-task interference during initial learning of a new motor task results from competition for the same brain areas.
Rémy F; Wenderoth N; Lipkens K; Swinnen SP
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2517-27. PubMed ID: 20434467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?
Head J; Helton WS
Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):913-9. PubMed ID: 23838467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sustained Attention in Auditory and Visual Monitoring Tasks: Evaluation of the Administration of a Rest Break or Exogenous Vibrotactile Signals.
Arrabito GR; Ho G; Aghaei B; Burns C; Hou M
Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1403-16. PubMed ID: 26276365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task.
Finkbeiner KM; Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25537468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-related differences in performance and stimulus processing in dual task situation.
Hahn M; Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M
Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1414():66-76. PubMed ID: 21871612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of arousing negative and neutral picture stimuli on target detection in a vigilance task.
Helton WS; Russell PN
Hum Factors; 2011 Apr; 53(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 21702331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of emotional stimuli on target detection: indirect and direct resource costs.
Ossowski U; Malinen S; Helton WS
Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1649-58. PubMed ID: 21978909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limited Cognitive Resources Explain a Trade-Off between Perceptual and Metacognitive Vigilance.
Maniscalco B; McCurdy LY; Odegaard B; Lau H
J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(5):1213-1224. PubMed ID: 28028197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does perceptual learning require consciousness or attention?
Meuwese JD; Post RA; Scholte HS; Lamme VA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 25(10):1579-96. PubMed ID: 23691987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
