These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25694957)

  • 21. Compressed Sensing Photoacoustic Imaging Reconstruction Using Elastic Net Approach.
    Liu X; Dai S; Wang M; Zhang Y
    Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():7877049. PubMed ID: 36721731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Non-local total-variation (NLTV) minimization combined with reweighted L1-norm for compressed sensing CT reconstruction.
    Kim H; Chen J; Wang A; Chuang C; Held M; Pouliot J
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(18):6878-6891. PubMed ID: 27589006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Iterative algorithm for multiple illumination photoacoustic tomography (MIPAT) using ultrasound channel data.
    Shao P; Harrison T; Zemp RJ
    Biomed Opt Express; 2012 Dec; 3(12):3240-9. PubMed ID: 23243574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diffuse optical tomographic reconstruction using multifrequency data.
    Burcin Unlu M; Birgul O; Shafiiha R; Gulsen G; Nalcioglu O
    J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(5):054008. PubMed ID: 17092157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Incident Photon Number and Reconstructed Linear Attenuation Coefficients in Iterative CT Image Reconstruction].
    Shinohara H; Hashimoto T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2019; 38(4):143-158. PubMed ID: 30828046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Low-dose CT reconstruction via L1 dictionary learning regularization using iteratively reweighted least-squares.
    Zhang C; Zhang T; Li M; Peng C; Liu Z; Zheng J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Jun; 15(1):66. PubMed ID: 27316680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sparse image reconstruction of intracerebral hemorrhage with electrical impedance tomography.
    Shi Y; Wu Y; Wang M; Tian Z; Kong X; He X
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2021 Jan; 8(1):014501. PubMed ID: 33457443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance evaluation of typical approximation algorithms for nonconvex ℓp-minimization in diffuse optical tomography.
    Shaw CB; Yalavarthy PK
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Apr; 31(4):852-62. PubMed ID: 24695149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fundamental study on diffuse reflective optical tomography.
    Endoh R; Suzuki A; Fujii M; Nakayama K
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 May; 49(10):1881-9. PubMed ID: 15214530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sparsity-based photoacoustic image reconstruction with a linear array transducer and direct measurement of the forward model.
    Shang R; Archibald R; Gelb A; Luke GP
    J Biomed Opt; 2018 Dec; 24(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 30550047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitative photoacoustic tomography from boundary pressure measurements: noniterative recovery of optical absorption coefficient from the reconstructed absorbed energy map.
    Banerjee B; Bagchi S; Vasu RM; Roy D
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Sep; 25(9):2347-56. PubMed ID: 18758563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimizing the regularization for image reconstruction of cerebral diffuse optical tomography.
    Habermehl C; Steinbrink J; Müller KR; Haufe S
    J Biomed Opt; 2014 Sep; 19(9):96006. PubMed ID: 25208243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. L
    Lu W; Lighter D; Styles IB
    Biomed Opt Express; 2018 Apr; 9(4):1423-1444. PubMed ID: 29675293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of source localization techniques in diffuse optical tomography for fNIRS application using a realistic head model.
    Tremblay J; Martínez-Montes E; Vannasing P; Nguyen DK; Sawan M; Lepore F; Gallagher A
    Biomed Opt Express; 2018 Jul; 9(7):2994-3016. PubMed ID: 30619642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diffuse optical tomography: image reconstruction and verification.
    Ansari MA; Erfanzadeh M; Hosseini Z; Mohajerani E
    J Lasers Med Sci; 2014; 5(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 25606334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reconstruct the Photoacoustic Image Based On Deep Learning with Multi-frequency Ring-shape Transducer Array.
    Lan H; Yang C; Jiang D; Gao F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():7115-7118. PubMed ID: 31947476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Back-propagation neural network-based reconstruction algorithm for diffuse optical tomography.
    Feng J; Sun Q; Li Z; Sun Z; Jia K
    J Biomed Opt; 2018 Dec; 24(5):1-12. PubMed ID: 30569669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Signal magnitude nonlinearity to an absorption coefficient in photoacoustic imaging.
    Kang D
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2020 Jan; 37(1):163-173. PubMed ID: 32118894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Model-based reconstruction integrated with fluence compensation for photoacoustic tomography.
    Bu S; Liu Z; Shiina T; Kondo K; Yamakawa M; Fukutani K; Someda Y; Asao Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 May; 59(5):1354-63. PubMed ID: 22345521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sparsity-based nonlinear reconstruction of optical parameters in two-photon photoacoustic computed tomography.
    Gupta M; Mishra RK; Roy S
    Inverse Probl; 2021 Apr; 37(4):. PubMed ID: 35368616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.