These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Relation between quality of cervical smears and probability of abnormal results. Buntinx F; Knottnerus JA; Crebolder HF; Essed GG; Schouten H BMJ; 1992 May; 304(6836):1224. PubMed ID: 1515793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are we ready for a paradigm change in cervical cancer screening? Franco EL Lancet; 2003 Dec; 362(9399):1866-7. PubMed ID: 14667737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. European guidelines on cervical screening. Smith JH; Desai MS Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. National Cancer Institute Workshop. JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(7):931-4. PubMed ID: 2754794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears]. Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Borderline smears--a time for change? Dudding N Cytopathology; 2000 Aug; 11(4):275-6. PubMed ID: 10983728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears. Baker RM Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears. Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]