These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25696419)

  • 1. Are cardiac interventions without onsite surgery worth the risk?
    van der Graaf Y
    Neth Heart J; 2005 Oct; 13(10):355-359. PubMed ID: 25696419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Wennberg DE; Lucas FL; Siewers AE; Kellett MA; Malenka DJ
    JAMA; 2004 Oct; 292(16):1961-8. PubMed ID: 15507581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of 1,090 consecutive, elective, nonselected percutaneous coronary interventions at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery.
    Frutkin AD; Mehta SK; Patel T; Menon P; Safley DM; House J; Barth CW; Grantham JA; Marso SP
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jan; 101(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 18157965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup.
    Akasaka T; Hokimoto S; Sueta D; Tabata N; Oshima S; Nakao K; Fujimoto K; Miyao Y; Shimomura H; Tsunoda R; Hirose T; Kajiwara I; Matsumura T; Nakamura N; Yamamoto N; Koide S; Nakamura S; Morikami Y; Sakaino N; Kaikita K; Nakamura S; Matsui K; Ogawa H;
    J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):103-109. PubMed ID: 26928574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention following coronary artery bypass graft--a descriptive analysis of the changing interface between interventional cardiologist and cardiac surgeon.
    Adams MR; Orford JL; Blake GJ; Wainstein MV; Byrne JG; Selwyn AP
    Clin Cardiol; 2002 Jun; 25(6):280-6. PubMed ID: 12058791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Too many coronary intervention centres in the Netherlands].
    van der Graaf Y
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A947. PubMed ID: 19860927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percutaneous coronary intervention with vs without on-site cardiac surgery backup: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zia MI; Wijeysundera HC; Tu JV; Lee DS; Ko DT
    Can J Cardiol; 2011; 27(5):664.e9-16. PubMed ID: 21546209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A total of 1,007 percutaneous coronary interventions without onsite cardiac surgery: acute and long-term outcomes.
    Ting HH; Raveendran G; Lennon RJ; Long KH; Singh M; Wood DL; Gersh BJ; Rihal CS; Holmes DR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 47(8):1713-21. PubMed ID: 16631012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac surgery: Correlations within providers and operators.
    Guida P; Iacoviello M; Passantino A; Scrutinio D
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 240():97-102. PubMed ID: 28476517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.
    Deb S; Wijeysundera HC; Ko DT; Tsubota H; Hill S; Fremes SE
    JAMA; 2013 Nov; 310(19):2086-95. PubMed ID: 24240936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It's good to talk! Changes in coronary revascularisation practice in PCI centres without onsite surgical cover and the impact of an angiography video conferencing system.
    Veasey RA; Hyde JA; Lewis ME; Trivedi UH; Cohen AC; Lloyd GW; Furniss SS; Patel NR; Sulke AN
    Int J Clin Pract; 2011 Jun; 65(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 21564437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonemergent percutaneous coronary interventions in a veterans affairs medical center without onsite cardiac surgery.
    Roussanov O; Estacio G; Capuno M; Archuleta L; Hill J; Jarmukli NF
    Am Heart J; 2006 Nov; 152(5):909-13. PubMed ID: 17070156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective.
    Osnabrugge RL; Magnuson EA; Serruys PW; Campos CM; Wang K; van Klaveren D; Farooq V; Abdallah MS; Li H; Vilain KA; Steyerberg EW; Morice MC; Dawkins KD; Mohr FW; Kappetein AP; Cohen DJ;
    Heart; 2015 Dec; 101(24):1980-8. PubMed ID: 26552756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adherence of catheterization laboratory cardiologists to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what happens in actual practice?
    Hannan EL; Racz MJ; Gold J; Cozzens K; Stamato NJ; Powell T; Hibberd M; Walford G; ;
    Circulation; 2010 Jan; 121(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 20048207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.
    Cohen DJ; Osnabrugge RL; Magnuson EA; Wang K; Li H; Chinnakondepalli K; Pinto D; Abdallah MS; Vilain KA; Morice MC; Dawkins KD; Kappetein AP; Mohr FW; Serruys PW;
    Circulation; 2014 Sep; 130(14):1146-57. PubMed ID: 25085960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kentucky pilot project for primary PCI without onsite CABG.
    Myers J; Brock G; Appana S; Gray L
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2009 Nov; 107(11):451-8. PubMed ID: 19999862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The waiting time for heart interventions: trends for percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiothoracic interventions].
    Huijskes RV; Koch KT; van Herwerden LA; Berreklouw E; Limburg M; Tijssen JG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Sep; 147(38):1860-5. PubMed ID: 14533500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures.
    Mack MJ; Brown PP; Kugelmass AD; Battaglia SL; Tarkington LG; Simon AW; Culler SD; Becker ER
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 77(3):761-6; discussion 766-8. PubMed ID: 14992867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial.
    Morice MC; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP; Feldman TE; Ståhle E; Colombo A; Mack MJ; Holmes DR; Choi JW; Ruzyllo W; Religa G; Huang J; Roy K; Dawkins KD; Mohr F
    Circulation; 2014 Jun; 129(23):2388-94. PubMed ID: 24700706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.
    Head SJ; Milojevic M; Daemen J; Ahn JM; Boersma E; Christiansen EH; Domanski MJ; Farkouh ME; Flather M; Fuster V; Hlatky MA; Holm NR; Hueb WA; Kamalesh M; Kim YH; Mäkikallio T; Mohr FW; Papageorgiou G; Park SJ; Rodriguez AE; Sabik JF; Stables RH; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(4):386-398. PubMed ID: 30025574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.