These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25697083)

  • 1. Validation of FRAX without BMD: an age-related analysis of the Fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V-1, 2010).
    Kim JW; Koh JM; Park JH; Chang JS
    Bone; 2015 Jun; 75():27-31. PubMed ID: 25697083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of bone mineral density in therapeutic decision-making using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX): a sub-study of the Taiwan OsteoPorosis Survey (TOPS).
    Chen JF; Yu SF; Hsu CY; Chiu WC; Wu CH; Lai HM; Chen YC; Su YJ; Chen JF; Cheng TT
    Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Oct; 14(1):101. PubMed ID: 31650396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment.
    Leslie WD; Lix LM; Langsetmo L; Berger C; Goltzman D; Hanley DA; Adachi JD; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):817-27. PubMed ID: 21161509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.
    Fraser LA; Langsetmo L; Berger C; Ioannidis G; Goltzman D; Adachi JD; Papaioannou A; Josse R; Kovacs CS; Olszynski WP; Towheed T; Hanley DA; Kaiser SM; Prior J; Jamal S; Kreiger N; Brown JP; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA; Leslie WD;
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):829-37. PubMed ID: 21161508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture risk prediction using FRAX®: a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.
    Tamaki J; Iki M; Kadowaki E; Sato Y; Kajita E; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Yoneshima H
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Dec; 22(12):3037-45. PubMed ID: 21279504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of FRAX in a cohort of community-dwelling, ambulatory older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.
    Ettinger B; Ensrud KE; Blackwell T; Curtis JR; Lapidus JA; Orwoll ES;
    Osteoporos Int; 2013 Apr; 24(4):1185-93. PubMed ID: 23179575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of the Brazilian Fracture Assessment Risk Tool (FRAX) model and the age-dependent intervention thresholds according to National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidelines on fracture prediction in community-dwelling older adults: the São Paulo Ageing and Health (SPAH) Study.
    Freitas TQ; Olalla LFG; Machado LG; Figueiredo CP; Takayama L; de Falco Caparbo V; Domiciano DS; Pereira RMR
    Arch Osteoporos; 2024 Jul; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 38990403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there an interaction between socioeconomic status and FRAX 10-year fracture probability determined with and without bone density measures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study of female cohort.
    Brennan SL; Quirk SE; Hosking SM; Kotowicz MA; Holloway KL; Moloney DJ; Dobbins AG; Pasco JA
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2015 Feb; 96(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 25578145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.
    Bastos-Silva Y; Aguiar LB; Pinto-Neto AM; Baccaro LF; Costa-Paiva L
    Arch Osteoporos; 2016; 11():16. PubMed ID: 27067597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FRAX- vs. T-score-based intervention thresholds for osteoporosis.
    Johansson H; Azizieh F; Al Ali N; Alessa T; Harvey NC; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Nov; 28(11):3099-3105. PubMed ID: 28782072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of expanding indications for drug treatment to prevent fracture in older men in United States: cross sectional and longitudinal analysis of prospective cohort study.
    Ensrud KE; Taylor BC; Peters KW; Gourlay ML; Donaldson MG; Leslie WD; Blackwell TL; Fink HA; Orwoll ES; Schousboe J;
    BMJ; 2014 Jul; 349():g4120. PubMed ID: 24994809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low Predictive Value of FRAX Adjusted by Trabecular Bone Score for Osteoporotic Fractures in Korean Women: A Community-Based Cohort Study.
    Kim H; Kim JH; Kim MJ; Hong AR; Choi H; Ku E; Lee JH; Shin CS; Cho NH
    Endocrinol Metab (Seoul); 2020 Jun; 35(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 32615720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice.
    Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):391-7. PubMed ID: 21365460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of FRAX on the Prediction of Osteoporotic Fractures in Urban Middle-aged and Elderly Healthy Chinese Adults.
    Wang J; Wang X; Fang Z; Lu N; Han L
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2017 May; 72(5):289-293. PubMed ID: 28591341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX--assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK.
    Kanis JA; McCloskey EV; Johansson H; Strom O; Borgstrom F; Oden A;
    Osteoporos Int; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1395-408. PubMed ID: 18751937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FRAX score with and without bone mineral density: a comparison and factors affecting the discordance in osteoporosis treatment in Thais.
    Teeratakulpisarn N; Charoensri S; Theerakulpisut D; Pongchaiyakul C
    Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 33635451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.
    Lin J; Yang Y; Fei Q; Zhang X; Ma Z; Wang Q; Li J; Li D; Meng Q; Wang B
    Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():461-9. PubMed ID: 27217730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Celiac disease is associated with reduced bone mineral density and increased FRAX scores in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Kamycheva E; Goto T; Camargo CA
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Mar; 28(3):781-790. PubMed ID: 27714440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.