BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25697131)

  • 1. Time-course of trigeminal versus olfactory stimulation: evidence from chemosensory evoked potentials.
    Flohr EL; Boesveldt S; Haehner A; Iannilli E; Sinding C; Hummel T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 25697131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Rombaux P; Mouraux A; Bertrand B; Guerit JM; Hummel T
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2006; 36(2):53-62. PubMed ID: 16844543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration.
    Stuck BA; Frey S; Freiburg C; Hörmann K; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1367-75. PubMed ID: 16651024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are there sex-related differences in responses to repetitive olfactory/trigeminal stimuli?
    Scheibe M; Opatz O; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Aug; 266(8):1323-6. PubMed ID: 19002476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemosensory event-related brain potentials (CSERP) after strictly monorhinal stimulation.
    Gudziol H; Fischer J; Bitter T; Guntinas-Lichius O
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Sep; 93(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 24952214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems.
    Livermore A; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jan; 29(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 14752039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chemosensory event-related potentials to trigeminal stimuli change in relation to the interval between repetitive stimulation of the nasal mucosa.
    Hummel T; Kobal G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 10065380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chemosensory event-related potentials in early blind humans.
    Cuevas I; Plaza P; Rombaux P; Mouraux A; Delbeke J; Collignon O; De Volder AG; Renier L
    B-ENT; 2011; 7(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21563551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chemosensory event-related potentials during sleep--a pilot study.
    Stuck BA; Weitz H; Hörmann K; Maurer JT; Hummel T
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 16934401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Event-related brain potentials to attended and ignored olfactory and trigeminal stimuli.
    Geisler MW; Murphy C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2000 Sep; 37(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 10858576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The neural representation of odor is modulated by the presence of a trigeminal stimulus during odor encoding.
    Bensafi M; Frasnelli J; Reden J; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):696-701. PubMed ID: 17208517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Habituation effects of pleasant and unpleasant odors.
    Croy I; Maboshe W; Hummel T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Apr; 88(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 23473955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-frequency analysis of chemosensory event-related potentials to characterize the cortical representation of odors in humans.
    Huart C; Legrain V; Hummel T; Rombaux P; Mouraux A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33221. PubMed ID: 22427997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trigeminal event-related potentials in patients with olfactory dysfunction.
    Rombaux P; Mouraux A; Keller T; Hummel T
    Rhinology; 2008 Sep; 46(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 18853866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Olfactory and chemosomatosensory function in pregnant women assessed with event-related potentials.
    Olofsson JK; Broman DA; Wulff M; Martinkauppi M; Nordin S
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Sep; 86(1-2):252-7. PubMed ID: 16112693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central processing of odor concentration is a temporal phenomenon as revealed by chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP).
    Pause BM; Sojka B; Ferstl R
    Chem Senses; 1997 Feb; 22(1):9-26. PubMed ID: 9056082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials.
    Olofsson JK; Nordin S
    Chem Senses; 2004 Sep; 29(7):629-37. PubMed ID: 15337687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex differentiated responses to intranasal trigeminal stimuli.
    Lundström JN; Frasnelli J; Larsson M; Hummel T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Sep; 57(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 16109289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Olfactory, auditory, and visual ERPs from single trials: no evidence for habituation.
    Wetter S; Polich J; Murphy C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Nov; 54(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 15331217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chemosensory event-related potentials in the investigation of interactions between the olfactory and the somatosensory (trigeminal) systems.
    Livermore A; Hummel T; Kobal G
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Sep; 83(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 1381671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.