188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25697141)
1. CE-Chirp® ABR in cerebellopontine angle surgery neuromonitoring: technical assessment in four cases.
Di Scipio E; Mastronardi L
Neurosurg Rev; 2015 Apr; 38(2):381-4; discussion 384. PubMed ID: 25697141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Intraoperative monitoring of hearing function in the removal of cerebellopontine angle tumor: auditory brainstem response and cochlear nerve compound action potential].
Yamakami I; Ushikubo O; Uchino Y; Kobayashi E; Saeki N; Yamaura A; Oka N
No Shinkei Geka; 2002 Mar; 30(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 11905020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superiority of tympanic ball electrodes over mastoid needle electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of hearing function.
Krieg SM; Kempf L; Droese D; Rosahl SK; Meyer B; Lehmberg J
J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1042-7. PubMed ID: 24559226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory brainstem responses to level-specific chirps in normal-hearing adults.
Kristensen SG; Elberling C
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):712-21. PubMed ID: 23072963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vestibular schwannoma and hearing preservation: Usefulness of level specific CE-Chirp ABR monitoring. A retrospective study on 25 cases with preoperative socially useful hearing.
Mastronardi L; Di Scipio E; Cacciotti G; Roperto R
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 165():108-115. PubMed ID: 29334639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve compound action potential in cerebellopontine angle tumour removal.
Yamakami I; Oka N; Yamaura A
J Clin Neurosci; 2003 Sep; 10(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 12948461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microvascular decompression for typical trigeminal neuralgia: Personal experience with intraoperative neuromonitoring with level-specific-CE-Chirp® brainstem auditory evoked potentials in preventing possible hearing loss.
Mastronardi L; Caputi F; Cacciotti G; Scavo CG; Roperto R; Sufianov A
Surg Neurol Int; 2020; 11():388. PubMed ID: 33408922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring: when is change in wave V significant?
James ML; Husain AM
Neurology; 2005 Nov; 65(10):1551-5. PubMed ID: 16301480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing preservation and intraoperative auditory brainstem response and cochlear nerve compound action potential monitoring in the removal of small acoustic neurinoma via the retrosigmoid approach.
Yamakami I; Yoshinori H; Saeki N; Wada M; Oka N
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2009 Feb; 80(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 18977821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hearing preservation after removal of small vestibular schwannomas by retrosigmoid approach: comparison of two different ABR neuromonitoring techniques.
Mastronardi L; Di Scipio E; Cacciotti G; Roperto R; Scavo CG
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2019 Jan; 161(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 30483984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative auditory steady-state monitoring during surgery in the cerebellopontine angle for estimation of postoperative hearing classes.
Rampp S; Rensch L; Simmermacher S; Rahne T; Strauss C; Prell J
J Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 127(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 27739939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of two-electrode montages on the level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp auditory brainstem response (ABR) at multiple intensity levels.
Dzulkarnain AAA; Noor Ibrahim SHM; Anuar NFA; Abdullah SA; Tengku Zam Zam TZH; Rahmat S; Mohd Ruzai MA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):723-732. PubMed ID: 28415891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation Analysis and Comparison of Adult CE-Chirp ABR Response Threshold and Pure Tone Hearing Threshold.
Cheng HY; Zhang YG; Chen Y; Yin S; Lü M; Li CX
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 40(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 38500456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neonate Auditory Brainstem Responses to CE-Chirp and CE-Chirp Octave Band Stimuli II: Versus Adult Auditory Brainstem Responses.
Cobb KM; Stuart A
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):724-743. PubMed ID: 27556524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.
Rodrigues GR; Ramos N; Lewis DR
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neurophysiological mechanisms of conduction impairment of the auditory nerve during cerebellopontine angle surgery.
Sato S; Yamada M; Koizumi H; Onozawa Y; Shimokawa N; Kawashima E; Fujii K
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 19109061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory brainstem responses for click and CE-chirp stimuli in individuals with and without occupational noise exposure.
Pushpalatha ZV; Konadath S
Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):260-265. PubMed ID: 27762255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which stimulus should be used for auditory brainstem response in newborns; CE-Chirp® level specific versus Click stimulus.
Kaynakoğlu B; Ceyhan S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 170():111597. PubMed ID: 37178522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic neuroma surgery: use of cochlear nerve action potential monitoring for hearing preservation.
Jackson LE; Roberson JB
Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):249-59. PubMed ID: 10733193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
