These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25697428)

  • 1. [Evidence-based medicine: can we trust the results of well-designed randomized trials?].
    Maturana A; Benaglio C
    Rev Chil Pediatr; 2014 Oct; 85(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 25697428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials.
    Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Smith HS
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(6):717-73. PubMed ID: 19057624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of the randomized controlled trial and its role in evidence-based decision making.
    Devereaux PJ; Yusuf S
    J Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 254(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 12859691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The necessity for clinical reasoning in the era of evidence-based medicine.
    Sniderman AD; LaChapelle KJ; Rachon NA; Furberg CD
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2013 Oct; 88(10):1108-14. PubMed ID: 24079680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Creating and synthesizing evidence with decision makers in mind: integrating evidence from clinical trials and other study designs.
    Atkins D
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S16-22. PubMed ID: 17909376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Secondary use of randomized controlled trials to evaluate drug safety: a review of methodological considerations.
    Hammad TA; Pinheiro SP; Neyarapally GA
    Clin Trials; 2011 Oct; 8(5):559-70. PubMed ID: 21878445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Zhang JH; Shang HC; Zhang BL
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 6(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 18405597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Epidemiology Workshop 8--appraising a study on therapy.
    Yu IT; Tse SL
    Hong Kong Med J; 2012 Oct; 18(5):419-20. PubMed ID: 23018070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing the Impact of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
    Elmunzer BJ
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Sep; 149(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 26226569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is right and what is wrong about evidence-based medicine?
    Julian DG
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Suppl):S2-5. PubMed ID: 12950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical trials: methodological requirements and interpretation].
    Windeler J; Lange S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Apr; 52(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 19322527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corroborating evidence-based medicine.
    Mebius A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):915-20. PubMed ID: 24738869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based neurosurgery. Basic concepts for the appraisal and application of scientific information to patient care (Part II).
    Esene IN; Baeesa SS; Ammar A
    Neurosciences (Riyadh); 2016 Jul; 21(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 27356649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Study Designs and Sources of Error in Medical Research.
    Kacha AK; Nizamuddin SL; Nizamuddin J; Ramakrishna H; Shahul SS
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Dec; 32(6):2789-2801. PubMed ID: 29571641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consideration of medical research vs. scientific research.
    Pyle DE
    Med Hypotheses; 2005; 65(6):1199. PubMed ID: 16144744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From randomized trials to registry studies: translating data into clinical information.
    Brown ML; Gersh BJ; Holmes DR; Bailey KR; Sundt TM
    Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2008 Oct; 5(10):613-20. PubMed ID: 18679381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Guyatt G; Akl EA; Oxman A; Wilson K; Puhan MA; Wilt T; Gutterman D; Woodhead M; Antman EM; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 23256168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine. Interpreting studies and setting policy.
    Woolf SH; George JN
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2000 Aug; 14(4):761-84. PubMed ID: 10949772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.