These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25697975)

  • 1. Robotic sacrocolpopexy. A review.
    St Louis S; Salamon C
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 25697975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F
    Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery.
    Parkes IL; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):546-57. PubMed ID: 24462593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a case series of 31 patients by a single surgeon with a long term follow-up.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Villa M; Sportelli C; Pezzotta MG
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Feb; 69(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 28116884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy.
    Lee W; Tam J; Kobashi K
    Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 30466696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical techniques for advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse.
    Brown DN; Strauchon C; Gonzalez H; Gruber D
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26448444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
    Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
    Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic Female Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Review.
    Clifton MM; Pizarro-Berdichevsky J; Goldman HB
    Urology; 2016 May; 91():33-40. PubMed ID: 26723179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-Port Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Description of an Advanced Minimally Invasive Approach and Review of the Relevant Literature.
    Mueller MG; Ashmore S; Collins S; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Sep; 35(9):1757-1762. PubMed ID: 39073630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conventional laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: tips and tricks.
    Lenger SM; White WM
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 26448443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent vaginal vault prolapse after sex reassignment surgery in a trans-woman.
    Kavvadias T; Seifert HH; Ebbing J; Garcia DN; Kind AB
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):569-570. PubMed ID: 30686072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic/Laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: a urology perspective.
    Burgess KL; Elliott DS
    Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 22877718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.