These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25697975)

  • 21. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Oliver JL; Kim JH
    Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Sep; 18(9):66. PubMed ID: 28718162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.
    Jong K; Klein T; Zimmern PE
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):455-460. PubMed ID: 28980173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy.
    Ashmore S; Kenton K; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):260. PubMed ID: 38904835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Integration of a Robotic Platform for Sacrocolpopexy in Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A Novel Surgical Technique.
    Guan X; Guan Z; Koythong T; Liu J; Delgado S; Wang Q
    Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():109-114. PubMed ID: 33775785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abdominal approaches to pelvic prolapse repairs.
    Pollard ME; Eilber KS; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 23673511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Occhino JA; Habermann EB; Glasgow AE; Bews KA; Gershman B
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):862-867. PubMed ID: 29630983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Sajadi KP; Goldman HB
    Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 25800401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perioperative outcomes after robotic versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Nguyen JN; Yang ST
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 31332703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling.
    Liu J; Bardawil E; Zurawin RK; Wu J; Fu H; Orejuela F; Guan X
    JSLS; 2018; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 30356342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Patnam R; Husk K; Sripad A; Barletta K; Dieter A; Geller EJ
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 32300933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic Complete Excision of Sacrocolpopexy Mesh: Standardized Technique.
    Suarez-Salvador E; Yi J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1226. PubMed ID: 31005582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.
    Takacs EB; Kreder KJ
    Curr Urol Rep; 2016 Dec; 17(12):90. PubMed ID: 27796653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A live porcine model for robotic sacrocolpopexy training.
    Kasabwala K; Goueli R; Culligan PJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 31055610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction: first experience using the SP da Vinci platform.
    Ganesan V; Goueli R; Rodriguez D; Hess D; Carmel M
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):753-758. PubMed ID: 32036495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.