These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25697975)
21. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial. Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse? Oliver JL; Kim JH Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Sep; 18(9):66. PubMed ID: 28718162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy. Jong K; Klein T; Zimmern PE J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):455-460. PubMed ID: 28980173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy. Ashmore S; Kenton K; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):260. PubMed ID: 38904835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integration of a Robotic Platform for Sacrocolpopexy in Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A Novel Surgical Technique. Guan X; Guan Z; Koythong T; Liu J; Delgado S; Wang Q Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():109-114. PubMed ID: 33775785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perioperative outcomes after robotic versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Nguyen JN; Yang ST J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 31332703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling. Liu J; Bardawil E; Zurawin RK; Wu J; Fu H; Orejuela F; Guan X JSLS; 2018; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 30356342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women. Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A live porcine model for robotic sacrocolpopexy training. Kasabwala K; Goueli R; Culligan PJ Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 31055610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction: first experience using the SP da Vinci platform. Ganesan V; Goueli R; Rodriguez D; Hess D; Carmel M J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):753-758. PubMed ID: 32036495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]