BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25698005)

  • 1. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
    Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 31584504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.
    Gibbs BE; Bernstein JGW; Brungart DS; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):1230. PubMed ID: 36050186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
    Brungart DS; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.
    Fogerty D; Xu J; Gibbs BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1800. PubMed ID: 27914381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.
    Müller V; Lang-Roth R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulations of cochlear-implant speech perception in modulated and unmodulated noise.
    Ihlefeld A; Deeks JM; Axon PR; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):870-80. PubMed ID: 20707456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.
    Freyman RL; Griffin AM; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2514-23. PubMed ID: 23039445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
    Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.