These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25698024)

  • 1. Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual processing performance in typically developing children: modality independence versus dependence.
    Pillai R; Yathiraj A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):923-34. PubMed ID: 25698024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normative data for diagnosing auditory processing disorder in Norwegian children aged 7-12 years.
    Mattsson TS; Follestad T; Andersson S; Lind O; Øygarden J; Nordgård S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 28835140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening Test for Auditory Processing (STAP): a preliminary report.
    Yathiraj A; Maggu AR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):867-78. PubMed ID: 24224993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The utility of visual analogs of central auditory tests in the differential diagnosis of (central) auditory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Bellis TJ; Billiet C; Ross J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):501-14. PubMed ID: 22031675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory and visual differences in time perception? An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests.
    Zélanti PS; Droit-Volet S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jul; 112(3):296-311. PubMed ID: 22621934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual training is better than auditory-only training for auditory-only speech-in-noise identification.
    Lidestam B; Moradi S; Pettersson R; Ricklefs T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL142-7. PubMed ID: 25096138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of normal adults and children on central auditory diagnostic tests and their corresponding visual analogs.
    Bellis TJ; Ross J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):491-500. PubMed ID: 22031674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception in noise: exploring the effect of linguistic context in children with and without auditory processing disorder.
    Lagacé J; Jutras B; Giguère C; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):385-95. PubMed ID: 21599614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiovisual speech perception development at varying levels of perceptual processing.
    Lalonde K; Holt RF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1713. PubMed ID: 27106318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments.
    Brungart DS; Sheffield BM; Kubli LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):777-90. PubMed ID: 25096112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opposite perceptual biases in analogous auditory and visual tasks are unique to consonant-vowel strings and are unlikely a consequence of repetition.
    Parker AJ; Hontaru ME; Lin R; Ollerenshaw S; Bonandrini R
    Laterality; 2024 May; 29(3):283-312. PubMed ID: 38700997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of noise and audiovisual cues on speech processing in adults with and without ADHD.
    Michalek AM; Watson SM; Ash I; Ringleb S; Raymer A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 24456181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues.
    Fraser S; Gagné JP; Alepins M; Dubois P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 19635945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental dyslexia: exploring how much phonological and visual attention span disorders are linked to simultaneous auditory processing deficits.
    Lallier M; Donnadieu S; Valdois S
    Ann Dyslexia; 2013 Jul; 63(2):97-116. PubMed ID: 22829423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age related changes in auditory processes in children aged 6 to 10 years.
    Yathiraj A; Vanaja CS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1224-34. PubMed ID: 26060149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of visual information on auditory lateralization.
    Saetrevik B
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 51(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 20497397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
    Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.