94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25698049)
1. Human cortical sensitivity to interaural level differences in low- and high-frequency sounds.
Salminen NH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL190-3. PubMed ID: 25698049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrated processing of spatial cues in human auditory cortex.
Salminen NH; Takanen M; Santala O; Lamminsalo J; Altoè A; Pulkki V
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():143-52. PubMed ID: 26074304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of binaural and monaural cues to identify the lateral position of a virtual object using echoes.
Rowan D; Papadopoulos T; Edwards D; Allen R
Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():32-9. PubMed ID: 25660196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human cortical sensitivity to interaural time difference in high-frequency sounds.
Salminen NH; Altoè A; Takanen M; Santala O; Pulkki V
Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():99-106. PubMed ID: 25668126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial variation in signal and sensory precision both constrain auditory acuity at high frequencies.
Brown AD; Benichoux V; Jones HG; Anbuhl KL; Tollin DJ
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():65-73. PubMed ID: 30326382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trading of dynamic interaural time and level difference cues and its effect on the auditory motion-onset response measured with electroencephalography.
Altmann CF; Ueda R; Bucher B; Furukawa S; Ono K; Kashino M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():185-194. PubMed ID: 28756239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The contribution of high frequencies to human brain activity underlying horizontal localization of natural spatial sounds.
Leino S; May PJ; Alku P; Liikkanen LA; Tiitinen H
BMC Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 8():78. PubMed ID: 17897443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: Discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences.
Diedesch AC; Stecker GC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 26233013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.
Johnson BW; Hautus MJ
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2610-9. PubMed ID: 20466010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques.
Palomäki KJ; Tiitinen H; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 16099350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.
Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA; Eddins AC
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):737-748. PubMed ID: 31242052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of the frequency of interaural time difference in the human brain.
Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
Neuroreport; 2006 Apr; 17(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 16543815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrasting monaural and interaural spectral cues for human sound localization.
Jin C; Corderoy A; Carlile S; van Schaik A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3124-41. PubMed ID: 15237837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay.
Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing.
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2817-26. PubMed ID: 22087910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial Processing Is Frequency Specific in Auditory Cortex But Not in the Midbrain.
Sollini J; Mill R; Sumner CJ
J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(27):6588-6599. PubMed ID: 28559383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptation to shifted interaural time differences changes encoding of sound location in human auditory cortex.
Trapeau R; Schönwiesner M
Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():26-38. PubMed ID: 26054873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Across-channel interaural-level-difference processing demonstrates frequency dependence.
Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):645. PubMed ID: 29495743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
