These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25698080)

  • 1. An experimental field study of weight salience and food choice.
    Incollingo Rodriguez AC; Finch LE; Buss J; Guardino CM; Tomiyama AJ
    Appetite; 2015 Jun; 89():215-8. PubMed ID: 25698080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Situational cues and momentary food environment predict everyday eating behavior in adults with overweight and obesity.
    Elliston KG; Ferguson SG; Schüz N; Schüz B
    Health Psychol; 2017 Apr; 36(4):337-345. PubMed ID: 27669177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The association between BMI development among young children and (un)healthy food choices in response to food advertisements: a longitudinal study.
    Folkvord F; Anschütz DJ; Buijzen M
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2016 Feb; 13():16. PubMed ID: 26861445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making snacking less sinful: (counter-)moralising obesity in the public discourse differentially affects food choices of individuals with high and low perceived body mass.
    Mulder LB; Rupp DE; Dijkstra A
    Psychol Health; 2015; 30(2):233-51. PubMed ID: 25254433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meals and snacks: Children's characterizations of food and eating cues.
    Marx JM; Hoffmann DA; Musher-Eizenman DR
    Appetite; 2016 Feb; 97():1-7. PubMed ID: 26585635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reasons for eating 'unhealthy' snacks in overweight and obese males and females.
    Cleobury L; Tapper K
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Aug; 27(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 24134077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eating by example. Effects of environmental cues on dietary decisions.
    Prinsen S; de Ridder DT; de Vet E
    Appetite; 2013 Nov; 70():1-5. PubMed ID: 23791633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When do healthiness and liking drive children's food choices? The influence of social context and weight status.
    Marty L; Nicklaus S; Miguet M; Chambaron S; Monnery-Patris S
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():466-473. PubMed ID: 29518470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of product placement in children's movies on children's snack choices.
    Brown CL; Matherne CE; Bulik CM; Howard JB; Ravanbakht SN; Skinner AC; Wood CT; Bardone-Cone AM; Brown JD; Perrin AJ; Levine C; Steiner MJ; Perrin EM
    Appetite; 2017 Jul; 114():118-124. PubMed ID: 28323061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of sales promotions, weight status, and impulsivity on purchases in a supermarket.
    Nederkoorn C
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2014 May; 22(5):E2-5. PubMed ID: 24127387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Food choice, eating behavior, and food liking differs between lean/normal and overweight/obese, low-income women.
    Dressler H; Smith C
    Appetite; 2013 Jun; 65():145-52. PubMed ID: 23428940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Healthy dining. Subtle diet reminders at the point of purchase increase low-calorie food choices among both chronic and current dieters.
    Papies EK; Veling H
    Appetite; 2013 Feb; 61(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23142564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eat it or beat it. The differential effects of food temptations on overweight and normal-weight restrained eaters.
    Ouwehand C; Papies EK
    Appetite; 2010 Aug; 55(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 20433882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prime a day keeps calories away: The effects of supraliminal priming on food consumption and the moderating role of gender and eating restraint.
    Minas RK; Poor M; Dennis AR; Bartelt VL
    Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():494-9. PubMed ID: 27235824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Food choices in the presence of 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' eating partners.
    Robinson E; Higgs S
    Br J Nutr; 2013 Feb; 109(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 22647276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Derailing the streetcar named desire. Cognitive distractions reduce individual differences in cravings and unhealthy snacking in response to palatable food.
    van Dillen LF; Andrade J
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():102-110. PubMed ID: 26375358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. It's the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life.
    Schüz B; Schüz N; Ferguson SG
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():149. PubMed ID: 26643690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An associative account of how the obesogenic environment biases adolescents' food choices.
    Watson P; Wiers RW; Hommel B; Ridderinkhof KR; de Wit S
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():560-571. PubMed ID: 26482282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From cookies to carrots; the effect of inhibitory control training on children's snack selections.
    Porter L; Bailey-Jones C; Priudokaite G; Allen S; Wood K; Stiles K; Parvin O; Javaid M; Verbruggen F; Lawrence NS
    Appetite; 2018 May; 124():111-123. PubMed ID: 28479406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Depletion sensitivity predicts unhealthy snack purchases.
    Salmon SJ; Adriaanse MA; Fennis BM; De Vet E; De Ridder DTD
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():25-31. PubMed ID: 26321417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.