These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25698513)

  • 1. Measuring coherence of computer-assisted likelihood ratio methods.
    Haraksim R; Ramos D; Meuwly D; Berger CE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Apr; 249():123-32. PubMed ID: 25698513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.
    Alberink I; de Jongh A; Rodriguez C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 24180303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
    Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Meuwly D; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 17199611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Likelihood ratio data to report the validation of a forensic fingerprint evaluation method.
    Ramos D; Haraksim R; Meuwly D
    Data Brief; 2017 Feb; 10():75-92. PubMed ID: 27981197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
    Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of pore features into the evaluation of fingerprint evidence.
    Anthonioz A; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 24148081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):131-50. PubMed ID: 24053874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation.
    Meuwly D; Ramos D; Haraksim R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():142-153. PubMed ID: 27181589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary on: Alberink I, de Jongh A, Rodriguez C. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios. J Forensic Sci 2014; 59(1):70-81.
    Neumann C; Saunders CP
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):252-6. PubMed ID: 25585667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance Study of a Score-based Likelihood Ratio System for Forensic Fingermark Comparison.
    Leegwater AJ; Meuwly D; Sjerps M; Vergeer P; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):626-640. PubMed ID: 28168685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 17209910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quantification of fingerprint quality using a relative contrast index.
    Humphreys JD; Porter G; Bell M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jun; 178(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 18359590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian analysis of fingerprint, face and signature evidences with automatic biometric systems.
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez J; Fierrez-Aguilar J; Ramos-Castro D; Ortega-Garcia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Dec; 155(2-3):126-40. PubMed ID: 16226150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exact computation of the distribution of likelihood ratios with forensic applications.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haned H; Snipen L; Sæbø S; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():93-101. PubMed ID: 24528587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fingerprint encryption scheme based on irreversible function and secure authentication.
    Yang Y; Yu J; Zhang P; Wang S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():673867. PubMed ID: 25873989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial analysis of corresponding fingerprint features from match and close non-match populations.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):87-98. PubMed ID: 23153799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--Modeling between finger variability.
    Egli Anthonioz NM; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Feb; 235():86-101. PubMed ID: 24447455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Yoo M; Genessay T; Langenburg G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():154-71. PubMed ID: 25637956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.