These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25700235)

  • 1. The effects of visual context and individual differences on perception and evaluation of modern art and graffiti art.
    Gartus A; Klemer N; Leder H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Mar; 156():64-76. PubMed ID: 25700235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks.
    van Paasschen J; Bacci F; Melcher DP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134241. PubMed ID: 26244368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aesthetic Evaluation of Computer Icons: Visual Pattern Differences Between Art-Trained and Lay Raters of Icons.
    Hu Z; Wang X; Hu X; Lei X; Liu H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2021 Feb; 128(1):115-134. PubMed ID: 33121355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why do you like Arcimboldo's portraits? Effect of perceptual style on aesthetic appreciation of ambiguous artworks.
    Boccia M; Barbetti S; Margiotta R; Guariglia C; Ferlazzo F; Giannini AM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1516-21. PubMed ID: 25085737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-cultural comparison of beauty judgments in visual art using machine learning analysis of art attribute predictors among Japanese and German speakers.
    Mikuni J; Spee BTM; Forlani G; Leder H; Scharnowski F; Nakamura K; Watanabe K; Kawabata H; Pelowski M; Steyrl D
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):15948. PubMed ID: 38987540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time.
    Brieber D; Nadal M; Leder H; Rosenberg R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99019. PubMed ID: 24892829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterizing the emotional response to art beyond pleasure: Correspondence between the emotional characteristics of artworks and viewers' emotional responses.
    Tinio PPL; Gartus A
    Prog Brain Res; 2018; 237():319-342. PubMed ID: 29779742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Context effects on emotional and aesthetic evaluations of artworks and IAPS pictures.
    Gerger G; Leder H; Kremer A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():174-83. PubMed ID: 24983515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.
    Era V; Candidi M; Aglioti SM
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3271-81. PubMed ID: 26238406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions.
    Carbon CC
    Iperception; 2017; 8(1):2041669517694184. PubMed ID: 28321289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does beauty capture the eye, even if it's not (overtly) adaptive? A comparative eye-tracking study of spontaneous attention and visual preference with VAST abstract art.
    Mitrovic A; Hegelmaier LM; Leder H; Pelowski M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103133. PubMed ID: 32717655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beauty in the blink of an eye: The time course of aesthetic experiences.
    Verhavert S; Wagemans J; Augustin MD
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Feb; 109(1):63-84. PubMed ID: 28805247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beauty: neglected, but alive and kicking.
    Redies C
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Nov; 105(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 25280120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Art expertise in construing meaning of representational and abstract artworks.
    Bimler DL; Snellock M; Paramei GV
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():11-22. PubMed ID: 30390421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Conundrum of Modern Art : Prestige-Driven Coevolutionary Aesthetics Trumps Evolutionary Aesthetics among Art Experts.
    Verpooten J; Dewitte S
    Hum Nat; 2017 Mar; 28(1):16-38. PubMed ID: 27704391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking.
    Richards MR; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Walther DB; Rosenstiel S; Sacksteder JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 25836007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parkinson's disease and changes in the appreciation of art: A comparison of aesthetic and formal evaluations of paintings between PD patients and healthy controls.
    Lauring JO; Pelowski M; Specker E; Ishizu T; Haugbøl S; Hollunder B; Leder H; Stender J; Kupers R
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Nov; 136():103597. PubMed ID: 31491732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "The Memory of Beauty" Survives Alzheimer's Disease (but Cannot Help Memory).
    Silveri MC; Ferrante I; Brita AC; Rossi P; Liperoti R; Mammarella F; Bernabei R; Marini Chiarelli MV; De Luca M
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 45(2):483-94. PubMed ID: 25550227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of labels in digital art experience: psychophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Castellotti S; D'Agostino O; Del Viva MM
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1342667. PubMed ID: 39011289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral and autonomic responses to real and digital reproductions of works of art.
    Siri F; Ferroni F; Ardizzi M; Kolesnikova A; Beccaria M; Rocci B; Christov-Bakargiev C; Gallese V
    Prog Brain Res; 2018; 237():201-221. PubMed ID: 29779735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.