These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1768 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25700243)

  • 21. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Barnawi A; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2011 Sep; 55(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 21968588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the Total and Hidden Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Zhang H; Chen ZX; Sun ZM; Jiang C; Ni WF; Lin Y; Wu YS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 107():739-743. PubMed ID: 28844914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction.
    Scheer JK; Auffinger B; Wong RH; Lam SK; Lawton CD; Nixon AT; Dahdaleh NS; Smith ZA; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 84(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 25753232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
    Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis with 1 or 2 dislocated levels.
    Flouzat-Lachaniette CH; Ratte L; Poignard A; Auregan JC; Queinnec S; Hernigou P; Allain J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 26315959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better Than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Tian W; Xu YF; Liu B; Liu YJ; He D; Yuan Q; Lang Z; Han XG
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):237-242. PubMed ID: 28632545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2 in spinal deformity, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative disease--part 1: Large series diagnosis related outcomes and complications with 2- to 9-year follow-up.
    Crandall DG; Revella J; Patterson J; Huish E; Chang M; McLemore R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):1128-36. PubMed ID: 23370679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Feb; 13(1):328-337. PubMed ID: 33426744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature.
    Vazan M; Gempt J; Meyer B; Buchmann N; Ryang YM
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2017 Jun; 159(6):1137-1146. PubMed ID: 28160064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical and radiographic outcomes using local bone shavings as autograft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kasliwal MK; Deutsch H
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):185-90. PubMed ID: 22120378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shen X; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; Zhou X; He S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1612-6. PubMed ID: 24814852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: 5-Year Outcomes.
    Yang Y; Liu ZY; Zhang LM; Pang M; Chhantyal K; Wu WB; Chen ZH; Luo CX; Rong LM; Liu B
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e602-e610. PubMed ID: 29778600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Results and Safety Outcomes.
    Lin Y; Chen W; Chen A; Li F
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 77(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 26091113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perioperative complications in patients undergoing open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as a revision surgery.
    Khan IS; Sonig A; Thakur JD; Bollam P; Nanda A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Mar; 18(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 23259540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.
    Mehta VA; McGirt MJ; Garcés Ambrossi GL; Parker SL; Sciubba DM; Bydon A; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Witham TF
    Neurol Res; 2011 Jan; 33(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20546682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis.
    Lau D; Terman SW; Patel R; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 23394166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 89.