These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25700745)

  • 1. Percutaneous circulatory assist devices for high-risk coronary intervention.
    Myat A; Patel N; Tehrani S; Banning AP; Redwood SR; Bhatt DL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):229-244. PubMed ID: 25700745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kar S
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2018 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 29350305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Miller PE; Solomon MA; McAreavey D
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1922-1929. PubMed ID: 28857849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prophylactic use of intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: will the Impella LP 2.5 device show superiority in a clinical randomized study?
    Syed AI; Kakkar A; Torguson R; Li Y; Ben-Dor I; Collins SD; Lemesle G; Maluenda G; Xue Z; Scheinowitz M; Kaneshige K; Satler LF; Kent KM; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Lindsay J; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20347798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overview of Impella and mechanical devices in cardiogenic shock.
    Chera HH; Nagar M; Chang NL; Morales-Mangual C; Dous G; Marmur JD; Ihsan M; Madaj P; Rosen Y
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Apr; 15(4):293-299. PubMed ID: 29600725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical Circulatory Support During Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia: Indications and Options.
    Virk SA; Keren A; John RM; Santageli P; Eslick A; Kumar S
    Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Jan; 28(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 30355468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined hemodynamic support with the Impella 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump for management of refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Pavlidis AN; Redwood SR; Clapp BR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):E50-1. PubMed ID: 24791724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices and their expanding applications.
    Spratt JR; Raveendran G; Liao K; John R
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2016 Oct; 14(10):1133-50. PubMed ID: 27450699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis.
    Mahmud E; Dominguez A; Bahadorani J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 88(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 27189238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience.
    Dixon SR; Henriques JP; Mauri L; Sjauw K; Civitello A; Kar B; Loyalka P; Resnic FS; Teirstein P; Makkar R; Palacios IF; Collins M; Moses J; Benali K; O'Neill WW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 2(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 19463408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care (Endorsed by the American Heart Association, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie D'intervention).
    Rihal CS; Naidu SS; Givertz MM; Szeto WY; Burke JA; Kapur NK; Kern M; Garratt KN; Goldstein JA; Dimas V; Tu T; ; ; ; ;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):E175-96. PubMed ID: 25851050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with heart failure.
    Kapur NK; Esposito M
    Heart Fail Clin; 2015 Apr; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 25834971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care (Endorsed by the American Heart Association, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention).
    Rihal CS; Naidu SS; Givertz MM; Szeto WY; Burke JA; Kapur NK; Kern M; Garratt KN; Goldstein JA; Dimas V; Tu T; ; ; ; ;
    J Card Fail; 2015 Jun; 21(6):499-518. PubMed ID: 26036425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Practical Approach to Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Interventional Perspective.
    Atkinson TM; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Rab T; Cigarroa JE;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):871-83. PubMed ID: 27151604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiac extracorporeal life support: state of the art in 2007.
    Cooper DS; Jacobs JP; Moore L; Stock A; Gaynor JW; Chancy T; Parpard M; Griffin DA; Owens T; Checchia PA; Thiagarajan RR; Spray TL; Ravishankar C
    Cardiol Young; 2007 Sep; 17 Suppl 2():104-15. PubMed ID: 18039404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.
    Subramaniam K; Boisen M; Shah PR; Ramesh V; Pete A
    Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2012 Jun; 26(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 22910086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Left ventricular assist for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Jones HA; Kalisetti DR; Gaba M; McCormick DJ; Goldberg S
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 24(10):544-50. PubMed ID: 23043040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The Impella system for mechanical support and myocardial recovery].
    Engström AE; de Mol BA; Lagrand WK; Henriques JP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154(45):A2699. PubMed ID: 21118589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-center experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device to support patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Al-Husami W; Yturralde F; Mohanty G; Pastore C; Lotun K; Venesy D; Waxman S; Pyne C; Gossman D; Nesto R; Piemonte T
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 20(6):319-22. PubMed ID: 18523330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cost-effectiveness of a new percutaneous ventricular assist device for high-risk PCI patients: mid-stage evaluation from the European perspective.
    Roos JB; Doshi SN; Konorza T; Palacios I; Schreiber T; Borisenko OV; Henriques JP
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(3):381-90. PubMed ID: 23301850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.