These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25701106)

  • 1. Assessing perceptual change with an ambiguous figures task: Normative data for 40 standard picture sets.
    Stöttinger E; Sepahvand NM; Danckert J; Anderson B
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 25701106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MEG sensor patterns reflect perceptual but not categorical similarity of animate and inanimate objects.
    Proklova D; Kaiser D; Peelen MV
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():167-177. PubMed ID: 30885785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category effects.
    Wiggett AJ; Pritchard IC; Downing PE
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3111-7. PubMed ID: 19631673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disentangling Representations of Object Shape and Object Category in Human Visual Cortex: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction.
    Proklova D; Kaiser D; Peelen MV
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 May; 28(5):680-92. PubMed ID: 26765944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of different underlying processes in pattern recall and decision-making.
    Gorman AD; Abernethy B; Farrow D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1813-31. PubMed ID: 25662705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced visual exploration for real objects compared to pictures during free viewing in the macaque monkey.
    Mustafar F; De Luna P; Rainer G
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():8-20. PubMed ID: 26003135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic classification of pictures and words.
    Taikh A; Hargreaves IS; Yap MJ; Pexman PM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1502-18. PubMed ID: 25403693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Name-picture verification as a control measure for object naming: a task analysis and norms for a large set of pictures.
    Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Damian MF; Pérez MA; Bowers JS; Marín J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1581-97. PubMed ID: 19123116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bottom-up processing of curvilinear visual features is sufficient for animate/inanimate object categorization.
    Zachariou V; Del Giacco AC; Ungerleider LG; Yue X
    J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 30458511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Action blindness in response to gradual changes.
    Berberian B; Chambaron-Ginhac S; Cleeremans A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):152-71. PubMed ID: 20117023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Animate Objects are Detected More Frequently than Inanimate Objects in Inattentional Blindness Tasks Independently of Threat.
    Calvillo DP; Hawkins WC
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 27055078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: evidence from naming and object decision.
    Lloyd-Jones TJ; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):18-35. PubMed ID: 9046867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modification of response time variability in a decision-making task.
    Stoet G; Ruge H; Snyder LH
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1321-4. PubMed ID: 18695516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new window into the interactions between perception and action.
    Baugh LA; Marotta JJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Feb; 160(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 17156849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relevance ratings and salience categorizations for objects in a set of 80 pictures.
    Marcell MM; Williams E
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):438-51. PubMed ID: 20479174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual change in response to a bistable picture increases neuromagnetic beta-band activities.
    Okazaki M; Kaneko Y; Yumoto M; Arima K
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Jul; 61(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 18468708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Neural Signature Encoding Decisions under Perceptual Ambiguity.
    Sun S; Yu R; Wang S
    eNeuro; 2017; 4(6):. PubMed ID: 29177189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speeded naming or naming speed? The automatic effect of object speed on performance.
    Ben-Haim MS; Chajut E; Hassin RR; Algom D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Apr; 144(2):326-38. PubMed ID: 25559652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grasping the other's attention: the role of animacy in action cueing of joint attention.
    Lindemann O; Nuku P; Rueschemeyer SA; Bekkering H
    Vision Res; 2011 Apr; 51(8):940-4. PubMed ID: 21215275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: the effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state.
    Pellicano A; Iani C; Borghi AM; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2190-201. PubMed ID: 20589580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.