These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25701107)

  • 1. Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff: Construct- and faking-related variance on the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Röhner J; Ewers T
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):243-58. PubMed ID: 25701107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exaggeration is harder than understatement, but practice makes perfect!
    Röhner J; Schröder-Abé M; Schütz A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 21592941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intentional faking of the single category Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Association Test.
    Stieger S; Göritz AS; Hergovich A; Voracek M
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 22049663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of implicitly incentivized faking on explicit and implicit measures of doping attitude: when athletes want to pretend an even more negative attitude to doping.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Brand R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0118507. PubMed ID: 25902142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Diffusion Model Approach for Understanding the Impact of 17 Interventions on the Race Implicit Association Test.
    Röhner J; Lai CK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1374-1389. PubMed ID: 33272117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Englert C; Brand R; Kissler J
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 May; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27142046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the implicit association test immune to faking?
    Steffens MC
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 15267125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes.
    Schindler S; Wolff W; Kissler JM; Brand R
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():139. PubMed ID: 26074798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IAT faking indices revisited: Aspects of replicability and differential validity.
    Röhner J; Holden RR; Schütz A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):670-693. PubMed ID: 35441359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.
    McFarland LA; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Oct; 85(5):812-21. PubMed ID: 11055152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Employing automatic approach and avoidance tendencies for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept: The implicit association procedure (IAP).
    Schnabel K; Banse R; Asendorpf J
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16610274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Process components of the Implicit Association Test: a diffusion-model analysis.
    Klauer KC; Voss A; Schmitz F; Teige-Mocigemba S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Sep; 93(3):353-68. PubMed ID: 17723053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety.
    Egloff B; Schmukle SC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1441-55. PubMed ID: 12500823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can People With Higher Versus Lower Scores on Impression Management or Self-Monitoring Be Identified Through Different Traces Under Faking?
    Röhner J; Thoss P; Uziel L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Jun; 84(3):594-631. PubMed ID: 38756458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cyberfaking: I can, so I will? Intentions to fake in online psychological testing.
    Grieve R; Elliott J
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 May; 16(5):364-9. PubMed ID: 23574347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: personalizing the IAT.
    Olson MA; Fazio RH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 May; 86(5):653-67. PubMed ID: 15161392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does discrimination beat association in the IAT? The discrimination-association model reconceived.
    Stefanutti L; Robusto E; Vianello M; Anselmi P; Dalla Rosa A; Bar-Anan Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1640-1656. PubMed ID: 32162277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection Of Faking on the Comrey Personality Scales.
    Comrey AL; Backer TE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1975 Jul; 10(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 26829632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the controllability of evaluative-priming effects: some limits that are none.
    Teige-Mocigemba S; Klauer KC
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(4):632-57. PubMed ID: 23075050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When old and frail is not the same: dissociating category and stimulus effects in four implicit attitude measurement methods.
    Gast A; Rothermund K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):479-98. PubMed ID: 19606404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.