169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25701533)
1. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.
Wu Y; Peng H; Zhao X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):967-74. PubMed ID: 25701533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differentiation of Breast Lesions: A Meta-analysis.
Ma X; Liu R; Zhu C; Zhang J; Ling W
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2095-102. PubMed ID: 27503752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ovarian tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma X; Zhao Y; Zhang B; Ling W; Zhuo H; Jia H; Li P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 46(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 25644038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma.
Liu J; Xu Y; Wang J
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 17433597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Hu Q; Wang XY; Zhu SY; Kang LK; Xiao YJ; Zheng HY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24436445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.
Qiao JJ; Yu J; Yu Z; Li N; Song C; Li M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118872. PubMed ID: 25764442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and in Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Meta-analysis.
Zhang F; Li R; Li G; Jin L; Shi Q; Du L
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Apr; 38(4):903-914. PubMed ID: 30203542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of DWI with quantitative ADC values in ovarian tumors: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Pi S; Cao R; Qiang JW; Guo YH
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1386-1394. PubMed ID: 29463093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional, Doppler and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses.
Liu Z; Yang F; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zhu H; Yang R; Fan L
Cell Physiol Biochem; 2016; 39(6):2398-2408. PubMed ID: 27832653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for differential diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis.
Lin LZ; Li F; Liu Y; Xing LX; Du LF
Med Ultrason; 2016 Jun; 18(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 27239649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography With SonoVue in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.
Lu J; Zhou P; Jin C; Xu L; Zhu X; Lian Q; Gong X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820971583. PubMed ID: 33308040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced ultrasound in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li Y; Tang J; Fei X; Gao Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 23103186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of IOTA simple rules for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis.
Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Naftalin J; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 44(5):503-14. PubMed ID: 24920435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa in the Differential Diagnosis of Malignant Ovarian Tumor and Benign Ovarian Tumor: A Meta-analysis.
Yue X; Zhong L; Wang Y; Zhang C; Chen X; Wang S; Hu J; Hu J; Wang C; Liu X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 May; 48(5):730-742. PubMed ID: 35272892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and serum CA-125 detection in differential diagnosis of ovarian masses].
Zhou Q; Liu BL; Jiang J; Lei XY
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Oct; 29(10):2007-9. PubMed ID: 19861251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-Analysis: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Conventional Ultrasound for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.
Li Q; Hu M; Chen Z; Li C; Zhang X; Song Y; Xiang F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 May; 44(5):919-929. PubMed ID: 29530434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Efficiency of Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System Combined With 3-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Scoring System in Evaluating Ovarian Tumor.
Yang L; Lv G; Chen H; Yang S; Liao J; Zhang W; Ke L
Ultrasound Q; 2020 Dec; 36(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 33298775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of conventional, doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xun L; Zhai L; Xu H
BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e052830. PubMed ID: 34952878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection of gallbladder carcinoma.
Wang W; Fei Y; Wang F
Med Ultrason; 2016 Sep; 18(3):281-28. PubMed ID: 27622402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]