These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25703605)

  • 1. Two pathways to causal control: use and availability of information in the environment in people with and without signs of depression.
    Byrom NC; Msetfi RM; Murphy RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():1-12. PubMed ID: 25703605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in causal uncertainty.
    Weary G; Edwards JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 Aug; 67(2):308-18. PubMed ID: 7932065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?
    Alloy LB; Abramson LY
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):441-85. PubMed ID: 528910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Superstition predicts perception of illusory control.
    Griffiths O; Shehabi N; Murphy RA; Le Pelley ME
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):499-518. PubMed ID: 30144046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment.
    White PA
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 23957568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Mobile Phones to Examine and Enhance Perceptions of Control in Mildly Depressed and Nondepressed Volunteers: Intervention Study.
    Msetfi R; O'Sullivan D; Walsh A; Nelson J; Van de Ven P
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Nov; 6(11):e10114. PubMed ID: 30413398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning from social rewards predicts individual differences in self-reported social ability.
    Heerey EA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):332-9. PubMed ID: 23339334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments.
    Matute H; Vegas S; De Marez PJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 12109763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced attention to context: An intervention that increases perceived control in mild depression.
    Msetfi RM; Brosnan L; Cavus HA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1073-81. PubMed ID: 26822778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rejection Sensitivity and Depression: Indirect Effects Through Problem Solving.
    Kraines MA; Wells TT
    Psychiatry; 2017; 80(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 28409720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attributions of depressed persons: how consistent are they with the covariation principle?
    Försterling F; Bühner M; Gall S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Oct; 75(4):1047-61. PubMed ID: 9825534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changing emotion dynamics: individual differences in the effect of anticipatory social stress on emotional inertia.
    Koval P; Kuppens P
    Emotion; 2012 Apr; 12(2):256-67. PubMed ID: 21787072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal Learning in Gambling Disorder: Beyond the Illusion of Control.
    Perales JC; Navas JF; Ruiz de Lara CM; Maldonado A; Catena A
    J Gambl Stud; 2017 Jun; 33(2):705-717. PubMed ID: 27664136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasoning strategies and prior knowledge effects in contingency learning.
    Béghin G; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Aug; 50(6):1269-1283. PubMed ID: 35484431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Depressive realism and outcome density bias in contingency judgments: the effect of the context and intertrial interval.
    Msetfi RM; Murphy RA; Simpson J; Kornbrot DE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 15702960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.