297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25704253)
21. Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain.
Vila-Candel R; Martín A; Escuriet R; Castro-Sánchez E; Soriano-Vidal FJ
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 32121364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Examining stratified cesarean section rates using Robson classification system at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital.
Amatya A; Paudel R; Poudyal A; Wagle RR; Singh M; Thapa S
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2013 Sep; 11(25):255-8. PubMed ID: 24908526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Tan JK; Tan EL; Kanagalingan D; Tan LK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Apr; 41(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 25371294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evolution of cesarean categories in a modified Robson classification in a single center from 2002 to 2012 due to high rate of maternal pathology.
Jayot A; Nizard J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jun; 42(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 27062530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative analysis of cesarean delivery rates over a 10-year period in a single Institution using 10-class classification.
Ciriello E; Locatelli A; Incerti M; Ghidini A; Andreani M; Plevani C; Regalia A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2717-20. PubMed ID: 22827562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of the Robson Ten Group Classification System to categorise operative vaginal delivery.
O'Leary BD; Kane DT; Kruseman Aretz N; Geary MP; Malone FD; Hehir MP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Dec; 60(6):858-864. PubMed ID: 32350863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.
Savchenko J; Ladfors L; Hjertberg L; Hildebrand E; Brismar Wendel S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jul; 101(7):827-835. PubMed ID: 35292960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of obstetrical interventions in women with vaginal and cesarean section delivered: cross-sectional study in a reference tertiary center in the Northeast of Brazil.
Medeiros MQ; Lima PHM; Augusto CLC; Viana BJA; Pinheiro BAK; Peixoto AB; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho CFH
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):201-207. PubMed ID: 31324110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Applying the Robson classification to routine facility data to understand the Caesarean section practice in conflict settings of South Kivu, eastern DR Congo.
Mulinganya G; Bwenge Malembaka E; Lukula Akonkwa M; Mpunga Mukendi D; Kajibwami Birindwa E; Maheshe Balemba G; Temmerman M; Tambwe AM; Criel B; Bisimwa Balaluka G
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0237450. PubMed ID: 32898139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cesarean delivery rates using Robson classification system in Ireland: What can we learn?
Crosby DA; Murphy MM; Segurado R; Byrne F; Mahony R; Robson M; McAuliffe FM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May; 236():121-126. PubMed ID: 30904815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does epidural increase the incidence of cesarean delivery or instrumental labor in Saudi populations?
Bakhamees H; Hegazy E
Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 19(3):693-704. PubMed ID: 18044297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiple pregnancy is the leading contributor to cesarean sections in in vitro fertilization pregnancies: An analysis using the Robson 10-group classification system.
Tan JK; Tan EL; Kanagalingam D; Yu SL; Tan LK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1141-5. PubMed ID: 27251069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.
Zimmo MW; Laine K; Hassan S; Bottcher B; Fosse E; Ali-Masri H; Zimmo K; Sørum Falk R; Lieng M; Vikanes Å
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022875. PubMed ID: 30361403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women.
Thorsell M; Lyrenäs S; Andolf E; Kaijser M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Oct; 90(10):1094-9. PubMed ID: 21679162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of early admission in labor on method of delivery.
Rahnama P; Ziaei S; Faghihzadeh S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Mar; 92(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 16434043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery.
Doyle NM; Riggs JW; Ramin SM; Sosa MA; Gilstrap LC
Am J Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 22(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 16118722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery.
Foley ME; Alarab M; Daly L; Keane D; Rath A; O'herlihy C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):891-5. PubMed ID: 15467560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pattern of Live Births in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, According to Robson Groups and the Kotelchuck Index Classification - 2015/2016.
Alcantara LLM; Almeida NKO; Almeida RMVR
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2020 Jul; 42(7):373-379. PubMed ID: 32736391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?
Heinberg EM; Wood RA; Chambers RB
J Reprod Med; 2002 May; 47(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 12063879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
