297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25704253)
41. Exploring Obstetrical Interventions and Stratified Cesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification in Tertiary Care Hospitals in the United Arab Emirates.
Abdulrahman M; Abdullah SS; Alaani AFK; AlAbdool NH; Sherif FEY; Ahmed ZS; Al-Rawi HI; Hubaishi NM; Tahlak MA; Carrick FR
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2019 Mar; 41(3):147-154. PubMed ID: 30873565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.
Kelly S; Sprague A; Fell DB; Murphy P; Aelicks N; Guo Y; Fahey J; Lauzon L; Scott H; Lee L; Kinniburgh B; Prince M; Walker M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Mar; 35(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 23470108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
; ; Caughey AB; Cahill AG; Guise JM; Rouse DJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 210(3):179-93. PubMed ID: 24565430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor.
Bergholt T; Lim LK; Jørgensen JS; Robson MS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):163.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17306665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cesarean delivery rates based on time and indication using the Robson Ten-Group Classification System: Assessment at a Turkish tertiary center.
Golbasi C; Golbasi H; Bayraktar B; Omeroglu I; Vural T; Sahingoz Yildirim AG; Ekin A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Mar; 49(3):883-892. PubMed ID: 36502809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Uterine contraction pattern as a predictor of the mode of delivery.
Oppenheimer LW; Bland ES; Dabrowski A; Holmes P; McDonald O; Wen SW
J Perinatol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 11896521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The Robson 10-group classification in Iceland: Obstetric interventions and outcomes.
Einarsdóttir K; Sigurðardóttir H; Ingibjörg Bjarnadóttir R; Steingrímsdóttir Þ; Smárason AK
Birth; 2019 Jun; 46(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 30628120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cesarean delivery in Norwegian nulliparous women with singleton cephalic term births, 1967-2020: a population-based study.
Sima YT; Skjærven R; Kvalvik LG; Morken NH; Klungsøyr K; Sørbye LM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 May; 22(1):419. PubMed ID: 35585522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among breech births.
Demirci O; Tuğrul AS; Turgut A; Ceylan S; Eren S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 21735191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The impact of maternal morbidity on cesarean section rates: exploring a Latin American network of sentinel facilities using the Robson's Ten Group Classification System.
Sosa C; de Mucio B; Colomar M; Mainero L; Costa ML; Guida JP; Souza RT; Luz AG; Cecatti JG; Sousa MH; Cruz CM; Chevez LM; Lopez R; Carrillo G; Rizo U; Saint Hillaire EE; Arriaga WE; Guadalupe RM; Ochoa C; Gonzalez F; Castro R; Stefan A; Moreno A; Serruya SJ
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Aug; 23(1):605. PubMed ID: 37620835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
Ennen CS; Bofill JA; Magann EF; Bass JD; Chauhan SP; Morrison JC
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 67(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 18971583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Outcomes of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term, an audit of deliveries at a Sydney tertiary obstetric hospital, 1997-2004.
Nassar N; Roberts CL; Cameron CA; Peat B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(10):1231-8. PubMed ID: 17068683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Investigating Caesarean Section Practice among Teenage Romanian Mothers Using Modified Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Matei A; Dimitriu MC; Roșu GA; Furău CG; Ionescu CA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Cesarean 10-group classification: a tool for clinical management of the delivery ward.
Maneschi F; Algieri M; Perrone S; Nale R; Sarno M
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Oct; 67(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 25588138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cumulative economic implications of initial method of delivery.
Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):549-55. PubMed ID: 16946214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twins: risk factors and neonatal outcome--a single center experience.
Aviram A; Weiser I; Ashwal E; Bar J; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 24853342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Indications of primary cesarean deliveries in a regional teaching hospital and reasonable strategies for reducing them].
Zelli P; Boussat B; Wetzel A; Ronin C; Pons JC; Sergent F
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):841-848. PubMed ID: 27593614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Induction of labor at term following external cephalic version in nulliparous women is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
Hants Y; Kabiri D; Elchalal U; Arbel-Alon S; Drukker L; Ezra Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 292(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 25657092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Severe postpartum morbidity and mode of delivery: a retrospective cohort study.
Farchi S; Polo A; Franco F; Di Lallo D; Guasticchi G
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1600-3. PubMed ID: 21050153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Avoiding the first cesarean section--results of structured organizational and cultural changes.
Blomberg M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 May; 95(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 26870916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
