These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25704253)

  • 81. Vaginal vs. cesarean delivery for preterm breech presentation of singleton infants in California: a population-based study.
    Robilio PA; Boe NM; Danielsen B; Gilbert WM
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Jun; 52(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 17694963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal According to Robson Ten Group Classification System.
    Vargas S; Rego S; Clode N
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2020 Jun; 42(6):310-315. PubMed ID: 32604433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives.
    Smith DC; Phillippi JC; Lowe NK; Breman RB; Carlson NS; Neal JL; Gutierrez E; Tilden EL
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Jan; 65(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 31553129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Mode of delivery after epidural analgesia in a cohort of low-risk nulliparas.
    Eriksen LM; Nohr EA; Kjaergaard H
    Birth; 2011 Dec; 38(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 22112332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.
    Cammu H; Martens E; Van Maele G
    J Pregnancy; 2020; 2020():2793296. PubMed ID: 33274077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners.
    Li WY; Liabsuetrakul T; Stray-Pedersen B
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jan; 40(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 24102777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. A randomized controlled trial on early induction compared to expectant management of nulliparous women with prolonged latent phases.
    Bräne E; Olsson A; Andolf E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1042-9. PubMed ID: 24974855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Quality assurance: The 10-Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery.
    Robson M; Murphy M; Byrne F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 26433499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Fetal presentation and successful twin vaginal delivery.
    Easter SR; Lieberman E; Carusi D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):116.e1-116.e10. PubMed ID: 26292044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes.
    Cheng YW; Shaffer BL; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 16582120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Mode of delivery for breech presentation in grandmultiparous women.
    Kumari AS; Grundsell H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Jun; 85(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 15145257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Malpresentations--impact on mode of delivery.
    Gardberg M; Leonova Y; Laakkonen E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 May; 90(5):540-2. PubMed ID: 21501123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Mode of delivery among nulliparous women with single, cephalic, term pregnancies: The WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health, 2004-2008.
    Harrison MS; Betrán AP; Vogel JP; Goldenberg RL; Gülmezoglu AM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Nov; 147(2):165-172. PubMed ID: 31353464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Unengaged vertex in nulliparous women in active labor. A risk factor for cesarean delivery.
    Falzone S; Chauhan SP; Mobley JA; Berg TG; Sherline DM; Devoe LD
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Aug; 43(8):676-80. PubMed ID: 9749418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Maternal age and risk of cesarean section in women with induced labor at term-A Nordic register-based study.
    Bergholt T; Skjeldestad FE; Pyykönen A; Rasmussen SC; Tapper AM; Bjarnadóttir RI; Smárason A; Másdóttir BB; Klungsøyr K; Albrechtsen S; Källén K; Gissler M; Løkkegaard ECL
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Feb; 99(2):283-289. PubMed ID: 31583694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Indications associated with increased cesarean section rates in a Swedish hospital.
    Florica M; Stephansson O; Nordström L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Feb; 92(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 16364324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Timing and consequences of early term and late term deliveries.
    Parikh L; Singh J; Timofeev J; Zahn CM; Istwan NB; Rhea DJ; Driggers RW
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Jul; 27(11):1158-62. PubMed ID: 24134662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Delivery outcomes in women undergoing elective labor induction at term.
    Tam T; Conte M; Schuler H; Malang S; Roque M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Mar; 287(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 23053315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Cesarean rates in a Chilean public hospital and the use of a new prioritization criteria: The relevance index.
    Yamamoto M; Latorre R; Rojas J; Walker B; Jordán F; Carrillo J; Paiva E; Insunza A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):578-584. PubMed ID: 30549150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Achievement of appropriate cesarean rates using Robson's 10-Group classification system in Brazilian private practice.
    Campos ASQ; Rattner D; Diniz CSG
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Jul; 23(1):504. PubMed ID: 37430192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.