These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25704649)

  • 1. Hemispheric lateralization in top-down attention during spatial relation processing: a Granger causal model approach.
    Falasca NW; D'Ascenzo S; Di Domenico A; Onofrj M; Tommasi L; Laeng B; Franciotti R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 41(7):914-24. PubMed ID: 25704649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Focusing narrowly or broadly attention when judging categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a MEG study.
    Franciotti R; D'Ascenzo S; Di Domenico A; Onofrj M; Tommasi L; Laeng B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83434. PubMed ID: 24386197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: an fMRI study.
    van der Ham IJ; Raemaekers M; van Wezel RJ; Oleksiak A; Postma A
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1297():70-9. PubMed ID: 19651111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lateralized perception: the role of attention in spatial relation processing.
    van der Ham IJ; Postma A; Laeng B
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2014 Sep; 45():142-8. PubMed ID: 24858009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top-down alpha oscillatory network interactions during visuospatial attention orienting.
    Doesburg SM; Bedo N; Ward LM
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():512-519. PubMed ID: 26952198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength.
    Zago L; Petit L; Mellet E; Jobard G; Crivello F; Joliot M; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt B):394-406. PubMed ID: 26626612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric differences in spatial relation processing in a scene perception task: a neuropsychological study.
    van der Ham IJM; van Zandvoort MJE; Frijns CJM; Kappelle LJ; Postma A
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):999-1005. PubMed ID: 21356223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual guidance modulates hemispheric asymmetries during an interlimb coordination task.
    Woolley DG; Wenderoth N; Heuninckx S; Zhang X; Callaert D; Swinnen SP
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 50(4):1566-77. PubMed ID: 20079443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatio-temporal indications of sub-cortical involvement in leftward bias of spatial attention.
    Okon-Singer H; Podlipsky I; Siman-Tov T; Ben-Simon E; Zhdanov A; Neufeld MY; Hendler T
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(4):3010-20. PubMed ID: 21056675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric differences in the voluntary control of spatial attention: direct evidence for a right-hemispheric dominance within frontal cortex.
    Duecker F; Formisano E; Sack AT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Aug; 25(8):1332-42. PubMed ID: 23574586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural basis for spatial relations.
    Amorapanth PX; Widick P; Chatterjee A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1739-53. PubMed ID: 19642889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention in near space.
    Longo MR; Trippier S; Vagnoni E; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():350-7. PubMed ID: 25446963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atypical hemispheric dominance for attention: functional MRI topography.
    Flöel A; Jansen A; Deppe M; Kanowski M; Konrad C; Sommer J; Knecht S
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2005 Sep; 25(9):1197-208. PubMed ID: 15815582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right hemisphere dominance during spatial selective attention and target detection occurs outside the dorsal frontoparietal network.
    Shulman GL; Pope DL; Astafiev SV; McAvoy MP; Snyder AZ; Corbetta M
    J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 30(10):3640-51. PubMed ID: 20219998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grid/no-grid working memory paradigm.
    Martin R; Houssemand C; Schiltz C; Burnod Y; Alexandre F
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):576-94. PubMed ID: 18037455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A left cerebral hemisphere's superiority in processing spatial-categorical information in a non-verbal semantic format.
    Suegami T; Laeng B
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Mar; 81(2):294-302. PubMed ID: 23290044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Varying the scope of attention alters the encoding of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Borst G; Kosslyn SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2769-72. PubMed ID: 20434469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oscillatory alpha modulations in right auditory regions reflect the validity of acoustic cues in an auditory spatial attention task.
    Weisz N; Müller N; Jatzev S; Bertrand O
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2579-90. PubMed ID: 23645711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.