BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25704897)

  • 1. Minimization of errors in biexponential T2 measurements of the prostate.
    Gilani N; Rosenkrantz AB; Malcolm P; Johnson G
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1072-7. PubMed ID: 25704897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging: multiexponential T2 decay in prostate tissue.
    Storås TH; Gjesdal KI; Gadmar ØB; Geitung JT; Kløw NE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1166-72. PubMed ID: 18972358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of T2 -weighted turbo spin echo imaging of the human prostate at 7 tesla.
    Maas MC; Vos EK; Lagemaat MW; Bitz AK; Orzada S; Kobus T; Kraff O; Maderwald S; Ladd ME; Scheenen TW
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 May; 71(5):1711-9. PubMed ID: 23798333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility and preliminary experience of quantitative T2* mapping at 3.0 T for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer.
    Wu LM; Chen XX; Xuan HQ; Liu Q; Suo ST; Hu J; Xu JR
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1020-6. PubMed ID: 25018074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range.
    Mulkern RV; Barnes AS; Haker SJ; Hung YP; Rybicki FJ; Maier SE; Tempany CM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 16735177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid quantitative T
    Dregely I; Margolis DA; Sung K; Zhou Z; Rangwala N; Raman SS; Wu HH
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Dec; 76(6):1720-1729. PubMed ID: 26765746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional balanced steady state free precession imaging of the prostate: flip angle dependency of the signal based on a two component T2-decay model.
    Storås TH; Gjesdal KI; Gadmar OB; Geitung JT; Kløw NE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1124-31. PubMed ID: 20432347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring water content using T2 relaxation at 3T: Phantom validations and simulations.
    Meyers SM; Kolind SH; Laule C; MacKay AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 34(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 26657977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the prostate: an apparent diffusion coefficient comparison of half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and echo planar imaging.
    Babourina-Brooks B; Cowin GJ; Wang D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 30(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22055748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Ocak I; Bernardo M; Metzger G; Barrett T; Pinto P; Albert PS; Choyke PL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):849. PubMed ID: 17885055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast 3D T2 -weighted imaging using variable flip angle transition into driven equilibrium (3D T2 -TIDE) balanced SSFP for prostate imaging at 3T.
    Srinivasan S; Wu HH; Sung K; Margolis DJ; Ennis DB
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Aug; 74(2):442-51. PubMed ID: 25195659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Triple-echo steady-state T2 relaxometry of the human brain at high to ultra-high fields.
    Heule R; Bär P; Mirkes C; Scheffler K; Trattnig S; Bieri O
    NMR Biomed; 2014 Sep; 27(9):1037-45. PubMed ID: 24986791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation of prostate cancer from normal prostate tissue in an animal model: conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Gemeinhardt O; Lüdemann L; Prochnow D; Abramjuk C; Taupitz M; Hamm B; Beyersdorff D
    Rofo; 2005 Jul; 177(7):935-9. PubMed ID: 15973594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporation of Rician noise in the analysis of biexponential transverse relaxation in cartilage using a multiple gradient echo sequence at 3 and 7 Tesla.
    Bouhrara M; Reiter DA; Celik H; Bonny JM; Lukas V; Fishbein KW; Spencer RG
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Jan; 73(1):352-66. PubMed ID: 24677270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer.
    Shinmoto H; Oshio K; Tanimoto A; Higuchi N; Okuda S; Kuribayashi S; Mulkern RV
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 27(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 18768281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of b-value distribution for biexponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal prostate.
    Jambor I; Merisaari H; Aronen HJ; Järvinen J; Saunavaara J; Kauko T; Borra R; Pesola M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1213-22. PubMed ID: 24127398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of three different cardiac T
    Baeßler B; Schaarschmidt F; Stehning C; Schnackenburg B; Giolda A; Maintz D; Bunck AC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1168-1178. PubMed ID: 27043352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of high-resolution echo-planar spectroscopic imaging with conventional MR imaging of prostate tumors in mice.
    Du W; Fan X; Foxley S; Zamora M; River JN; Culp RM; Karczmar GS
    NMR Biomed; 2005 Aug; 18(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 15973657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the accuracy of multicomponent T
    Chan RW; Lau AZ; Detzler G; Thayalasuthan V; Nam RK; Haider MA
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jan; 81(1):466-476. PubMed ID: 30058296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Liver: segment-specific analysis of B1 field homogeneity at 3.0-T MR imaging with single-source versus dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation.
    Pazahr S; Fischer MA; Chuck N; Luechinger R; Schick F; Nanz D; Boss A
    Radiology; 2012 Nov; 265(2):591-9. PubMed ID: 22929333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.