BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2570535)

  • 1. [Fentanyl versus sufentanil basic anesthesia. Hypnotic effect, muscle rigidity and efficacy of competitive muscle relaxants].
    Eberle B; Brandt L; Hennes HJ; el-Gindi M; Ellmauer S; Dick W
    Anaesthesist; 1989 Jul; 38(7):341-7. PubMed ID: 2570535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Sufentanil: the effect on cardiocirculatory parameters and intubation conditions on administration of pancuronium or vecuronium].
    Janik R; Dick W
    Anaesthesist; 1989 Dec; 38(12):673-80. PubMed ID: 2575875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid administration of a narcotic and neuromuscular blocker: a hemodynamic comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil, pancuronium, and vecuronium.
    Gravlee GP; Ramsey FM; Roy RC; Angert KC; Rogers AT; Pauca AL
    Anesth Analg; 1988 Jan; 67(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 2892437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodynamic effects of atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium during sufentanil anesthesia for coronary artery bypass.
    Waldmann CS; Wark KJ; Sebel PS; Feneck RO
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1986 Jul; 30(5):351-6. PubMed ID: 2876575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Haemodynamic interactions of muscle relaxants and sufentanil in coronary artery surgery.
    Côté D; Martin R; Tétrault JP
    Can J Anaesth; 1991 Apr; 38(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 1674677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Opioid analgesics in anesthesia: with special reference to their use in cardiovascular anesthesia.
    Bovill JG; Sebel PS; Stanley TH
    Anesthesiology; 1984 Dec; 61(6):731-55. PubMed ID: 6150663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison of pancuronium and vecuronium used during the induction of high-dose fentanyl anesthesia].
    Kobori M; Mouri Y; Shida K; Hosoyamada A
    Masui; 1993 Sep; 42(9):1324-9. PubMed ID: 7901441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Slow EEG-power spectra correlate with haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation following induction with fentanyl or sufentanil.
    Freye E; Dehnen-Seipel H; Latasch L; Behler M; Wilder-Smith OH
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1999; 50(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 10418645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Requisite muscle relaxation using vecuronium for tracheobronchial suction in neurosurgical intensive care patients].
    Werba A; Weinstabl C; Petricek W; Plainer B; Spiss CK
    Anaesthesist; 1991 Jun; 40(6):328-31. PubMed ID: 1679303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative chronotropic actions of sufentanil and vecuronium in chronically instrumented dogs pretreated with propranolol and/or diltiazem.
    Schmeling WT; Kampine JP; Warltier DC
    Anesth Analg; 1989 Jul; 69(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 2568103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of cardiovascular effects of pipecuronium versus vecuronium in patients receiving sufentanil anesthesia for myocardial revascularization.
    Starr NJ; Kraenzler EJ; Wong D; Koehler LS; Estafanous FG
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1991 Apr; 5(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 1677820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Interactions of H2 antagonists and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants].
    Tryba M; Wruck G
    Anaesthesist; 1989 May; 38(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 2567580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potentiation of atracurium by pancuronium during propofol-fentanyl-N2O anesthesia.
    Nathan N; Bonada G; Feiss P
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1996; 47(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 9093646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiovascular effects of pancuronium and vecuronium during high-dose fentanyl anesthesia.
    Salmenperä M; Peltola K; Takkunen O; Heinonen J
    Anesth Analg; 1983 Dec; 62(12):1059-64. PubMed ID: 6139962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Thomson IR; Harding G; Hudson RJ
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2000 Dec; 14(6):652-6. PubMed ID: 11139103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A comparison of hemodynamic changes with sufentanil-O2 and fentanyl-O2 anesthesia for coronary bypass grafting].
    Ikeda K; Ikeda T; Herregods L; Mortier E; Rolly G
    Masui; 1989 Nov; 38(11):1469-74. PubMed ID: 2531239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the onset, spontaneous recovery and train of four fade of the clinical neuromuscular block produced by pancuronium and pipecuronium.
    Gyermek L; Cantley EM
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1994 Nov; 32(11):600-5. PubMed ID: 7874374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiovascular effects of pancuronium, vecuronium, and atracurium during induction of anesthesia with sufentanil and lorazepam for myocardial revascularization.
    Dhamee MS; Olund T; Reynolds AC; Entress J; Kalbfleisch J
    J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Jun; 4(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 1983404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia.
    Yamamoto Y; Kawaguchi M; Hayashi H; Horiuchi T; Inoue S; Nakase H; Sakaki T; Furuya H
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Mar; 106(3):930-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18292442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anesthetic induction with fentanyl.
    Bailey PL; Wilbrink J; Zwanikken P; Pace NL; Stanley TH
    Anesth Analg; 1985 Jan; 64(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 2981489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.