238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25705956)
1. The effect of implant placement on sacroiliac joint range of motion: posterior versus transarticular.
Soriano-Baron H; Lindsey DP; Rodriguez-Martinez N; Reyes PM; Newcomb A; Yerby SA; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(9):E525-30. PubMed ID: 25705956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanics of unilateral and bilateral sacroiliac joint stabilization: laboratory investigation.
Lindsey DP; Parrish R; Gundanna M; Leasure J; Yerby SA; Kondrashov D
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 29303472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical nuances of percutaneous sacroiliac joint fixation: A cadaveric study.
Janjua MB; Ozturk A; Piazza M; Passias P; Arlet V; Welch WC
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():315-321. PubMed ID: 30424968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Biomechanical Changes After Sacroiliac Joint Fusion by Application of the 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis Technique.
Jeong JH; Leasure JM; Park J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():e538-e543. PubMed ID: 29933084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of two new atlantoaxial fixation techniques with C1-2 transarticular screw-graft fixation.
Härtl R; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; Chou D; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Oct; 5(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 17048771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sacroiliac joint stability: Finite element analysis of implant number, orientation, and superior implant length.
Lindsey DP; Kiapour A; Yerby SA; Goel VK
World J Orthop; 2018 Mar; 9(3):14-23. PubMed ID: 29564210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effects of a novel posteriorly placed sacroiliac joint fusion device integrated with traditional lumbopelvic long-construct instrumentation.
de Andrada Pereira B; Lehrman JN; Sawa AGU; Lindsey DP; Yerby SA; Godzik J; Waguespack AM; Uribe JS; Kelly BP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jun; 35(3):320-329. PubMed ID: 34144523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sacroiliac joint motion in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders.
Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sakaura H; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 25978076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical investigation of a novel integrated device for intra-articular stabilization of the C1-C2 (atlantoaxial) joint.
Robertson PA; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 22341395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of sacroiliac joint fixation with decortication.
Shih YC; Beaubien BP; Chen Q; Sembrano JN
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1241-1249. PubMed ID: 29481980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior intra-articular fixation stabilizes both primary and secondary sacroiliac joints: a cadaveric study and comparison to lateral trans-articular fixation literature.
Sayed D; Amirdelfan K; Hunter C; Raji OR
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jun; 18(1):406. PubMed ID: 37270508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel, Minimally Invasive, Sacroiliac Joint Fixation Device.
Cross WW; Berven SH; Slater N; Lehrman JN; Newcomb AGUS; Kelly BP
Int J Spine Surg; 2018 Oct; 12(5):587-594. PubMed ID: 30364882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinetic analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion supplemented with transarticular facet screws.
Traynelis VC; Sherman J; Nottmeier E; Singh V; McGilvray K; Puttlitz CM; Leahy PD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 May; 20(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 24559463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.
Takigawa T; Simon P; Espinoza Orías AA; Hong JT; Ito Y; Inoue N; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(12):E696-701. PubMed ID: 22158063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis comparing three C1-C2 transarticular screw salvaging fixation techniques.
Elgafy H; Potluri T; Goel VK; Foster S; Faizan A; Kulkarni N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 20081561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
