These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25706000)

  • 41. Microbiomes and chemical components of feed water and membrane-attached biofilm in reverse osmosis system to treat membrane bioreactor effluents.
    Inaba T; Hori T; Aizawa H; Sato Y; Ogata A; Habe H
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16805. PubMed ID: 30429505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Non-destructive approaches for assessing biofouling of household reverse osmosis membranes.
    Markwardt SD; Ronnie N; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2018 Aug; 34(7):740-752. PubMed ID: 30270657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Biofouling behaviors of reverse osmosis membrane in the presence of trace plasticizer for circulating cooling water treatment: Characteristics and mechanisms.
    Luo Y; Qiu R; Zhang X; Li F
    Water Res; 2024 Aug; 260():121937. PubMed ID: 38878313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Determination and occurrence of organic micropollutants in reverse osmosis treatment for advanced water reuse.
    Gomez V; Majamaa K; Pocurull E; Borrull F
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 22678201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of the extent of bacterial growth in reverse osmosis system for improving drinking water quality.
    Park SK; Hu JY
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010; 45(8):968-77. PubMed ID: 20512722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of water temperature on biofouling development in reverse osmosis membrane systems.
    Farhat NM; Vrouwenvelder JS; Van Loosdrecht MCM; Bucs SS; Staal M
    Water Res; 2016 Oct; 103():149-159. PubMed ID: 27450353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Characterization of bacterial biofilm communities in tertiary treatment processes for wastewater reclamation and reuse.
    Shoji T; Ochi S; Ozaki M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(5):1023-30. PubMed ID: 18824800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results.
    Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) between RO and NF processes for the reclamation of secondary effluent.
    Chang IS; Lee EW; Oh S; Kim Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):313-8. PubMed ID: 16003991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Community structure analysis of reverse osmosis membrane biofilms and the significance of Rhizobiales bacteria in biofouling.
    Pang CM; Liu WT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jul; 41(13):4728-34. PubMed ID: 17695921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Balancing carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in seawater as a strategy to prevent accelerated membrane biofouling.
    Huang S; Voutchkov N; Jiang S
    Water Res; 2019 Nov; 165():114978. PubMed ID: 31434013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bacteriophage therapy for membrane biofouling in membrane bioreactors and antibiotic-resistant bacterial biofilms.
    Bhattacharjee AS; Choi J; Motlagh AM; Mukherji ST; Goel R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2015 Aug; 112(8):1644-54. PubMed ID: 25728819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biofouling and microbial communities in membrane distillation and reverse osmosis.
    Zodrow KR; Bar-Zeev E; Giannetto MJ; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(22):13155-64. PubMed ID: 25295386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validation of 3D simulations of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling.
    Pintelon TR; Creber SA; von der Schulenburg DA; Johns ML
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Jul; 106(4):677-89. PubMed ID: 20205206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Forward osmosis for the treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate from water reclamation: process performance and fouling control.
    Kazner C; Jamil S; Phuntsho S; Shon HK; Wintgens T; Vigneswaran S
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(12):2431-7. PubMed ID: 24960004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparing membrane and spacer biofouling by Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Gram-positive Anoxybacillus sp. in forward osmosis.
    Bogler A; Rice D; Perreault F; Bar-Zeev E
    Biofouling; 2019 Jan; 35(1):104-116. PubMed ID: 30786764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparative pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial community change in biofilm formed on seawater reverse osmosis membrane.
    Kim IS; Lee J; Kima SJ; Yu HW; Jang A
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(1-4):125-36. PubMed ID: 24600849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rapid novel test for the determination of biofouling potential on reverse osmosis membranes.
    Manalo CV; Ohno M; Okuda T; Nakai S; Nishijima W
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(12):2978-85. PubMed ID: 27332844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Analysis of the microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor during initial stages of filtration.
    Piasecka A; Souffreau C; Vandepitte K; Vanysacker L; Bilad RM; Bie TD; Hellemans B; Meester LD; Yan X; Declerck P; Vankelecom IF
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(2):225-38. PubMed ID: 22353160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.