227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25706412)
1. Lack of detectable allergenicity in genetically modified maize containing "Cry" proteins as compared to native maize based on in silico & in vitro analysis.
Mathur C; Kathuria PC; Dahiya P; Singh AB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117340. PubMed ID: 25706412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of maize allergens - MON810 vs. its non-transgenic counterpart.
Fonseca C; Planchon S; Renaut J; Oliveira MM; Batista R
J Proteomics; 2012 Apr; 75(7):2027-37. PubMed ID: 22270010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety.
Panda R; Ariyarathna H; Amnuaycheewa P; Tetteh A; Pramod SN; Taylor SL; Ballmer-Weber BK; Goodman RE
Allergy; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 23205714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of human IgE binding to proteins of a genetically modified (GM) soybean and six non-GM soybeans grown in multiple locations.
Lu M; Jin Y; Ballmer-Weber B; Goodman RE
Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():216-223. PubMed ID: 29307601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance.
Goodman RE; Panda R; Ariyarathna H
J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8317-32. PubMed ID: 23848840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety evaluation of genetically modified mustard (V4) seeds in terms of allergenicity: comparison with native crop.
Misra A; Kumar S; Verma AK; Chanana NP; Das M; Dhawan V; Dwivedi PD
GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(4):273-82. PubMed ID: 22743705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety assessment by in vitro digestibility and allergenicity of genetically modified maize with an amaranth 11S globulin.
Sinagawa-García SR; Rascón-Cruz Q; Valdez-Ortiz A; Medina-Godoy S; Escobar-Gutiérrez A; Paredes-López O
J Agric Food Chem; 2004 May; 52(9):2709-14. PubMed ID: 15113180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid simulated gastric fluid digestion of in-seed/grain proteins expressed in genetically engineered crops.
Schafer BW; Embrey SK; Herman RA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Nov; 81():106-112. PubMed ID: 27497625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lack of cross-reactivity between the Bacillus thuringiensis derived protein Cry1F in maize grain and dust mite Der p7 protein with human sera positive for Der p7-IgE.
Ladics GS; Bardina L; Cressman RF; Mattsson JL; Sampson HA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 16406630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunological and metabolomic impacts of administration of Cry1Ab protein and MON 810 maize in mouse.
Adel-Patient K; Guimaraes VD; Paris A; Drumare MF; Ah-Leung S; Lamourette P; Nevers MC; Canlet C; Molina J; Bernard H; Créminon C; Wal JM
PLoS One; 2011 Jan; 6(1):e16346. PubMed ID: 21298004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the History of Safe Use of the Maize ZMM28 Protein.
Anderson JA; Brustkern S; Cong B; Deege L; Delaney B; Hong B; Lawit S; Mathesius C; Schmidt J; Wu J; Zhang J; Zimmermann C
J Agric Food Chem; 2019 Jul; 67(26):7466-7474. PubMed ID: 31184886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proteomic analysis of four Brazilian MON810 maize varieties and their four non-genetically-modified isogenic varieties.
Balsamo GM; Cangahuala-Inocente GC; Bertoldo JB; Terenzi H; Arisi AC
J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Nov; 59(21):11553-9. PubMed ID: 21958074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expression of endogenous proteins in maize hybrids in a multi-location field trial in India.
Gutha LR; Purushottam D; Veeramachaneni A; Tigulla S; Kodappully V; Enjala C; Rajput H; Anderson J; Hong B; Schmidt J; Bagga S
Transgenic Res; 2018 Aug; 27(4):331-342. PubMed ID: 29777501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Allergenicity assessment of transgenic mustard (Brassica juncea) expressing bacterial codA gene.
Singh AK; Mehta AK; Sridhara S; Gaur SN; Singh BP; Sarma PU; Arora N
Allergy; 2006 Apr; 61(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 16512812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased digestibility of two products in genetically modified food (CP4-EPSPS and Cry1Ab) after preheating.
Okunuki H; Teshima R; Shigeta T; Sakushima J; Akiyama H; Goda Y; Toyoda M; Sawada J
Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2002 Apr; 43(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 12092415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of transgenic rice seed accumulating a major Japanese cedar pollen allergen (Cry j 1) structurally disrupted for oral immunotherapy.
Yang L; Suzuki K; Hirose S; Wakasa Y; Takaiwa F
Plant Biotechnol J; 2007 Nov; 5(6):815-26. PubMed ID: 17714439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-molecular weight protein profiling of genetically modified maize using fast liquid chromatography electrospray ionization and time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
Koc A; Cañuelo A; Garcia-Reyes JF; Molina-Diaz A; Trojanowicz M
J Sep Sci; 2012 Jun; 35(12):1447-61. PubMed ID: 22740254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonadverse effects on allergenicity of isopentenyltransferase-transformed broccoli.
Liao EC; Chen JT; Chao ML; Yu SC; Chang CY; Chu WS; Tsai JJ
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2013; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23654078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular cloning of a class IV chitinase allergen from Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollen and competitive inhibition of its immunoglobulin E-binding capacity by latex C-serum.
Fujimura T; Shigeta S; Suwa T; Kawamoto S; Aki T; Masubuchi M; Hayashi T; Hide M; Ono K
Clin Exp Allergy; 2005 Feb; 35(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 15725197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
