These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25706614)

  • 21. Comparison of laboratory and clinical wear rates of resin composites.
    Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Erickson RL; Lambrechts P
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 15119711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of halogen irradiance on short- and long-term wear resistance of resin-based composite materials.
    Bhamra GS; Fleming GJ
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 18674811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-body wear of dental resin composites reinforced with silica-fused whiskers.
    Xu HH; Quinn JB; Giuseppetti AA; Eichmiller FC; Parry EE; Schumacher GE
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 15209227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of filler size and filler loading on wear of experimental flowable resin composites.
    Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Kawashima S; Suzuki M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 26():e20160652. PubMed ID: 29412366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of zirconia polycrystal and stainless steel on the wear of resin composites, dentin and enamel.
    Pereira GKR; Dutra DM; Werner A; Prochnow C; Valandro LF; Kleverlaan CJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Mar; 91():287-293. PubMed ID: 30611925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
    Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material.
    Hahnel S; Behr M; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characterization of third-body media particles and their effect on in vitro composite wear.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Beck P; Litaker MS; Burgess JO
    Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):e118-26. PubMed ID: 22578990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of wear between occlusal splint materials and resin composite materials.
    Reyes-Sevilla M; Kuijs RH; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ; Lobbezoo F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 45(7):539-544. PubMed ID: 29663496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The in vitro wear behavior of experimental resin-based composites derived from a commercial formulation.
    Finlay N; Hahnel S; Dowling AH; Fleming GJ
    Dent Mater; 2013 Apr; 29(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 23333236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wear properties of a novel resin composite compared to human enamel and other restorative materials.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Rondoni GD; Pirani M; Vadini M; Gattone M; De Angelis F
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(6):612-8. PubMed ID: 25084103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading.
    Ferracane JL; Condon JR
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jul; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 10551094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Wear of an enhanced resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Bansal R; Burgess J; Lawson NC
    Am J Dent; 2016 Jun; 29(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 27505995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An approach to understanding tribological behaviour of dental composites through volumetric wear loss and wear mechanism determination; beyond material ranking.
    Altaie A; Bubb NL; Franklin P; Dowling AH; Fleming GJ; Wood DJ
    J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():41-47. PubMed ID: 28215957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study.
    Pesun IJ; Olson AK; Hodges JS; Anderson GC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 11005910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of wear resistance and flexural strength of three kinds of bulk-fill composite resins].
    Zhang H; Zhang ML; Qiu LH; Yu JT; Zhan FL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Jun; 25(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 27609380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.