These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25706771)

  • 1. Processing of Arabic diacritical marks: phonological-syntactic disambiguation of homographic verbs and visual crowding effects.
    Hermena EW; Drieghe D; Hellmuth S; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):494-507. PubMed ID: 25706771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parafoveal processing of Arabic diacritical marks.
    Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2021-2038. PubMed ID: 27732043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does diacritics-based lexical disambiguation modulate word frequency, length, and predictability effects? An eye-movements investigation of processing Arabic diacritics.
    Hermena EW; Bouamama S; Liversedge SP; Drieghe D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259987. PubMed ID: 34780557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interplay between prosody and syntax in sentence processing: the case of subject- and object-control verbs.
    Bögels S; Schriefers H; Vonk W; Chwilla DJ; Kerkhofs R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):1036-53. PubMed ID: 19445602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Many ways to read your vowels--Neural processing of diacritics and vowel letters in Hebrew.
    Weiss Y; Katzir T; Bitan T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 121():10-9. PubMed ID: 26188258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plausibility and verb subeategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 15968918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MAWRID: A Model of Arabic Word Reading in Development.
    Saiegh-Haddad E
    J Learn Disabil; 2018; 51(5):454-462. PubMed ID: 28715927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
    Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of syntax on reading in neglect dyslexia.
    Friedmann N; Tzailer-Gross L; Gvion A
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Aug; 49(10):2803-16. PubMed ID: 21679719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognate effects in sentence context depend on word class, L2 proficiency, and task.
    Bultena S; Dijkstra T; van Hell JG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1214-41. PubMed ID: 24295513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. L2 Arabic learners' processing of Arabic garden-path sentences: a consistent reading pattern.
    Alseraye AMS
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1333112. PubMed ID: 38524296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing coordinate structures in Chinese: evidence from eye movements.
    Qingrong C; Yan H
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35517. PubMed ID: 22558163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthographic and root frequency effects in Arabic: Evidence from eye movements and lexical decision.
    Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Bouamama S; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):934-954. PubMed ID: 30247050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How readers process syntactic input depends on their goals.
    Vandendaele A; Declerck M; Grainger J; Snell J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103006. PubMed ID: 31955032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The logic in language: How all quantifiers are alike, but each quantifier is different.
    Feiman R; Snedeker J
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Jun; 87():29-52. PubMed ID: 27214380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the unbeaten path through syntactic priming.
    Arai M; Nakamura C; Mazuka R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):482-500. PubMed ID: 25528094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.
    Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK; Kello C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):528-53. PubMed ID: 8501429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological evidence for the time-course of verifying text ideas.
    Ferretti TR; Singer M; Patterson C
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 18675957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.