These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Multiaxial mechanical response and constitutive modeling of esophageal tissues: Impact on esophageal tissue engineering. Sommer G; Schriefl A; Zeindlinger G; Katzensteiner A; Ainödhofer H; Saxena A; Holzapfel GA Acta Biomater; 2013 Dec; 9(12):9379-91. PubMed ID: 23933485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Quantification of the mechanical properties of noncontracting canine myocardium under simultaneous biaxial loading. Yin FC; Strumpf RK; Chew PH; Zeger SL J Biomech; 1987; 20(6):577-89. PubMed ID: 3611134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Planar biaxial testing of soft biological tissue using rakes: A critical analysis of protocol and fitting process. Fehervary H; Smoljkić M; Vander Sloten J; Famaey N J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():135-151. PubMed ID: 26854936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Finite element implementation of a generalized Fung-elastic constitutive model for planar soft tissues. Sun W; Sacks MS Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2005 Nov; 4(2-3):190-9. PubMed ID: 16075264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A new three-dimensional exponential material model of the coronary arterial wall to include shear stress due to torsion. Van Epps JS; Vorp DA J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051001. PubMed ID: 19045508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis. Placido E; Meira JB; Lima RG; Muench A; de Souza RM; Ballester RY Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1086-92. PubMed ID: 17123595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The location- and depth-dependent mechanical response of the human cornea under shear loading. Sloan SR; Khalifa YM; Buckley MR Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 55(12):7919-24. PubMed ID: 25358729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A computationally efficient optimization kernel for material parameter estimation procedures. Schmid H; Nash MP; Young AA; Röhrle O; Hunter PJ J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 17408333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Methods for using 3-D ultrasound speckle tracking in biaxial mechanical testing of biological tissue samples. Yap CH; Park DW; Dutta D; Simon M; Kim K Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1029-42. PubMed ID: 25616585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. How important is sample alignment in planar biaxial testing of anisotropic soft biological tissues? A finite element study. Fehervary H; Vastmans J; Vander Sloten J; Famaey N J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Dec; 88():201-216. PubMed ID: 30179794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of shear stress on articular chondrocyte metabolism. Lane Smith R; Trindade MC; Ikenoue T; Mohtai M; Das P; Carter DR; Goodman SB; Schurman DJ Biorheology; 2000; 37(1-2):95-107. PubMed ID: 10912182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An anatomical heart model with applications to myocardial activation and ventricular mechanics. Hunter PJ; Nielsen PM; Smaill BH; LeGrice IJ; Hunter IW Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(5-6):403-26. PubMed ID: 1486783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Can machine learning accelerate soft material parameter identification from complex mechanical test data? Kakaletsis S; Lejeune E; Rausch MK Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2023 Feb; 22(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 36229697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]