BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25708083)

  • 1. Cognitive mechanisms for the evolution of religious thought.
    Fondevila S; Martín-Loeches M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 Sep; 1299():84-90. PubMed ID: 25708083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The sacred and the absurd--an electrophysiological study of counterintuitive ideas (at sentence level).
    Fondevila S; Martín-Loeches M; Jiménez-Ortega L; Casado P; Sel A; Fernández-Hernández A; Sommer W
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(5):445-57. PubMed ID: 22146056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief.
    Gervais WM; Norenzayan A
    Science; 2012 Apr; 336(6080):493-6. PubMed ID: 22539725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Counterintuitive Religious Ideas and Metaphoric Thinking: An Event-Related Brain Potential Study.
    Fondevila S; Aristei S; Sommer W; Jiménez-Ortega L; Casado P; Martín-Loeches M
    Cogn Sci; 2016 May; 40(4):972-91. PubMed ID: 26146789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.
    Pennycook G; Cheyne JA; Seli P; Koehler DJ; Fugelsang JA
    Cognition; 2012 Jun; 123(3):335-46. PubMed ID: 22481051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The origins of religious disbelief.
    Norenzayan A; Gervais WM
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2013 Jan; 17(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 23246230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why Do You Believe in God? Relationships between Religious Belief, Analytic Thinking, Mentalizing and Moral Concern.
    Jack AI; Friedman JP; Boyatzis RE; Taylor SN
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149989. PubMed ID: 27008093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution.
    Gervais WM
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():312-21. PubMed ID: 26072277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How cultural learning and cognitive biases shape religious beliefs.
    White CJ; Baimel A; Norenzayan A
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2021 Aug; 40():34-39. PubMed ID: 32896727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring Counterintuitiveness in Supernatural Agent Dream Imagery.
    Nordin A; Bjälkebring P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1728. PubMed ID: 31447725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Religious credence is not factual belief.
    Van Leeuwen N
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):698-715. PubMed ID: 25268465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychobiology of drug-induced religious experience: from the brain "locus of religion" to cognitive unbinding.
    Nencini P; Grant KA
    Subst Use Misuse; 2010 Nov; 45(13):2130-51. PubMed ID: 20388013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Theodiversity.
    Norenzayan A
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():465-88. PubMed ID: 26393871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why did this happen to me? Religious believers' and non-believers' teleological reasoning about life events.
    Banerjee K; Bloom P
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):277-303. PubMed ID: 25064830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of religious belief in humans: a brief review with a focus on cognition.
    Singh D; Chatterjee G
    J Genet; 2017 Jul; 96(3):517-524. PubMed ID: 28761016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Call to Use Cultural Competence When Teaching Evolution to Religious College Students: Introducing Religious Cultural Competence in Evolution Education (ReCCEE).
    Barnes ME; Brownell SE
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 29167225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Religion, morality, evolution.
    Bloom P
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2012; 63():179-99. PubMed ID: 21943167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who are we? Where did we come from? How religious identity divides and damns us all.
    Thomson JA
    Am J Psychoanal; 2009 Mar; 69(1):22-42. PubMed ID: 19295619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Melting lizards and crying mailboxes: children's preferential recall of minimally counterintuitive concepts.
    Banerjee K; Haque OS; Spelke ES
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(7):1251-89. PubMed ID: 23631765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Religious beliefs are factual beliefs: Content does not correlate with context sensitivity.
    Levy N
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():109-116. PubMed ID: 28161595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.