236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25708756)
1. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.
Calderwood AH; Thompson KD; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):691-699.e1. PubMed ID: 25708756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longer Withdrawal Time Is More Important than Excellent Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy of Adequate Bowel Preparation.
Choi JM; Seo JY; Lee J; Han YM; Jin EH; Bae JH; Lim JH
Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Apr; 66(4):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 32419115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-step validation of a deep learning-based system for the quantification of bowel preparation: a prospective, observational study.
Zhou W; Yao L; Wu H; Zheng B; Hu S; Zhang L; Li X; He C; Wang Z; Li Y; Huang C; Guo M; Zhang X; Zhu Q; Wu L; Deng Y; Zhang J; Tan W; Li C; Zhang C; Gong R; Du H; Zhou J; Sharma P; Yu H
Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Nov; 3(11):e697-e706. PubMed ID: 34538736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of quality of segmental bowel preparation on adenoma detection rate.
Guo R; Wang YJ; Liu M; Ge J; Zhang LY; Ma L; Huang WY; Zhai HH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):119. PubMed ID: 31286888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness.
Calderwood AH; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Logan JR; Zurfluh M; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 24629422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy.
Kluge MA; Williams JL; Wu CK; Jacobson BC; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Calderwood AH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):744-751. PubMed ID: 28648575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Tholey DM; Shelton CE; Francis G; Anantharaman A; Frankel RA; Shah P; Coan A; Hegarty SE; Leiby BE; Kastenberg DM
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 49(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 25494362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.
Clark BT; Rustagi T; Laine L
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. PubMed ID: 25135006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Boston bowel preparation scale score 6 has more missed lesions compared with 7-9.
Kim J; Choi JM; Lee J; Han YM; Jin EH; Lim JH; Bae JH; Seo JY
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1605. PubMed ID: 38238553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence of missed lesions in patients with inadequate bowel preparation through a very early repeat colonoscopy.
Pantaleón Sánchez M; Gimeno Garcia AZ; Bernad Cabredo B; García-Rodríguez A; Frago S; Nogales O; Diez Redondo P; Puig I; Romero Mascarell C; Romero Sánchez-Miguel I; Caballero N; Ibañez I; Hernandez Negrín D; Bujedo Sadornill G; Pérez Oltra A; Pérez Berbegal R; Casals G; Seoane Urgorri A; Riu Pons F; Amorós J; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA
Dig Endosc; 2022 Sep; 34(6):1176-1184. PubMed ID: 35189669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study.
Lee YJ; Kim ES; Choi JH; Lee KI; Park KS; Cho KB; Jang BK; Chung WJ; Hwang JS
Endoscopy; 2015 Nov; 47(11):1018-27. PubMed ID: 26182387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate?
Enestvedt BK; Brian Fennerty M; Zaman A; Eisen GM
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Oct; 34(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 21848798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of different bowel preparation regimen volumes for colorectal cancer screening and compliance with European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performance measures.
Theunissen F; Lantinga MA; Ter Borg PCJ; Ouwendijk RJT; Siersema PD; Bruno MJ;
United European Gastroenterol J; 2023 Jun; 11(5):448-457. PubMed ID: 37190897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of the Adenoma Detection Rate From the Polyp Detection Rate by Using a Conversion Factor in a Predominantly Hispanic Population.
Elhanafi S; Ortiz AM; Yarlagadda A; Tsai C; Eloliby M; Mallawaarachchi I; Dwivedi A; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 49(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 26035518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II).
Walter B; Klare P; Strehle K; Aschenbeck J; Ludwig L; Dikopoulos N; Mayr M; Neu B; Hann A; Mayer B; Meining A; von Delius S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):506-513.e4. PubMed ID: 30138612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.
Ng S; Sreenivasan AK; Pecoriello J; Liang PS
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2229-2233. PubMed ID: 31927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
