These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25708757)

  • 1. Comparing the effectiveness of competing tests for reducing colorectal cancer mortality: a network meta-analysis.
    Elmunzer BJ; Singal AG; Sussman JB; Deshpande AR; Sussman DA; Conte ML; Dwamena BA; Rogers MA; Schoenfeld PS; Inadomi JM; Saini SD; Waljee AK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):700-709.e3. PubMed ID: 25708757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang J; Cheng Z; Ma Y; He C; Lu Y; Zhao Y; Chang X; Zhang Y; Bai Y; Cheng N
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Dec; 16(4):252-263. PubMed ID: 28687458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Jodal HC; Helsingen LM; Anderson JC; Lytvyn L; Vandvik PO; Emilsson L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e032773. PubMed ID: 31578199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin JS; Perdue LA; Henrikson NB; Bean SI; Blasi PR
    JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1978-1998. PubMed ID: 34003220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis D; Ali MU; Warren R; Kenny M; Sherifali D; Raina P
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Dec; 15(4):298-313. PubMed ID: 27133893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening strategies on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
    D'Andrea E; Ahnen DJ; Sussman DA; Najafzadeh M
    Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):824-836. PubMed ID: 31777197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
    Hol L; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; van Dekken H; Reijerink JC; van der Togt AC; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ
    Gut; 2010 Jan; 59(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19671542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Elmunzer BJ; Hayward RA; Schoenfeld PS; Saini SD; Deshpande A; Waljee AK
    PLoS Med; 2012; 9(12):e1001352. PubMed ID: 23226108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of colorectal cancer screening on cancer-specific mortality in Europe: A systematic review.
    Gini A; Jansen EEL; Zielonke N; Meester RGS; Senore C; Anttila A; Segnan N; Mlakar DN; de Koning HJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I;
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 127():224-235. PubMed ID: 31932176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The association between organised colorectal cancer screening strategies and reduction of its related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ding H; Lin J; Xu Z; Wang HHX; Huang L; Huang J; Wong MCS
    BMC Cancer; 2024 Mar; 24(1):365. PubMed ID: 38515013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin JS; Piper MA; Perdue LA; Rutter CM; Webber EM; O'Connor E; Smith N; Whitlock EP
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2576-94. PubMed ID: 27305422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preventing colorectal cancer or early diagnosis: Which is best? A re-analysis of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Report.
    Swartz AW; Eberth JM; Strayer SM
    Prev Med; 2019 Jan; 118():104-112. PubMed ID: 30367971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Populations: Evidence Summary.
    Tinmouth J; Vella ET; Baxter NN; Dubé C; Gould M; Hey A; Ismaila N; McCurdy BR; Paszat L
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016; 2016():2878149. PubMed ID: 27597935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.
    Tinmouth J; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Allison JE
    Gut; 2015 Aug; 64(8):1327-37. PubMed ID: 26041750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.