These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25708763)
1. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Kim JS; Lee BI; Choi H; Jun SY; Park ES; Park JM; Lee IS; Kim BW; Kim SW; Choi MG Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):741-7. PubMed ID: 25708763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Lee CK; Shim JJ; Jang JY Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 108(10):1593-600. PubMed ID: 24042189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps. Park SK; Ko BM; Han JP; Hong SJ; Lee MS Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):527-32.e1. PubMed ID: 26358331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy. Komeda Y; Kashida H; Sakurai T; Tribonias G; Okamoto K; Kono M; Yamada M; Adachi T; Mine H; Nagai T; Asakuma Y; Hagiwara S; Matsui S; Watanabe T; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Chiba Y; Kudo M World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan; 23(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 28127206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Horiuchi A; Hosoi K; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 25922251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Jumbo biopsy forceps versus cold snares for removing diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Huh CW; Kim JS; Choi HH; Maeng IS; Jun SY; Kim BW Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jul; 90(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 30684600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hot snare polypectomy with or without saline solution/epinephrine lift for the complete resection of small colorectal polyps. Kim HS; Jung HY; Park HJ; Kim HM; Seong JH; Kang YS; Cho MY; Yu MH; Kang DR Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 29409923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy versus a suction pseudopolyp technique. Din S; Ball AJ; Riley SA; Kitsanta P; Johal S Endoscopy; 2015 Nov; 47(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 26165735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polypectomy for complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps. Zhang Q; Gao P; Han B; Xu J; Shen Y Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):733-740. PubMed ID: 28647136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incomplete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: a prospective single-arm observational study. Matsuura N; Takeuchi Y; Yamashina T; Ito T; Aoi K; Nagai K; Kanesaka T; Matsui F; Fujii M; Akasaka T; Hanaoka N; Higashino K; Tomita Y; Ito Y; Ishihara R; Iishi H; Uedo N Endoscopy; 2017 Mar; 49(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28192823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Cold Snare and Forceps Polypectomy Among Small POLYPs in Rates of Complete Resection: The TINYPOLYP Trial. Wei MT; Louie CY; Chen Y; Pan JY; Quan SY; Wong R; Brown R; Clark M; Jensen K; Lau H; Friedland S Am J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 117(8):1305-1310. PubMed ID: 35467557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Lv YC; Yao YH; Lei JJ; Tang T Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Dec; 42(6):757-765. PubMed ID: 37776439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Asai S; Yokota I; Akamine E; Kato M; Akamatsu T; Tada K; Komeda Y; Iwatate M; Kawakami K; Nishikawa M; Watanabe D; Yamauchi A; Fukata N; Shimatani M; Ooi M; Fujita K; Sano Y; Kashida H; Hirose S; Iwagami H; Uedo N; Teramukai S; Tanaka K Gut; 2018 Nov; 67(11):1950-1957. PubMed ID: 28970290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps. Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps. Desai S; Gupta S; Copur-Dahi N; Krinsky ML Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1206-1213. PubMed ID: 31183796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 24125514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]